You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
50 and older climate change deniers, why do you hate your grandchildren?
- Thread starter knowitall
- Start date
Johnny Conservative
New member
I would have to answer your question with another question. 35 and younger climate change kool-aid drinkers, why do you hate your grandchildren? You are going to burden them with taxes, bad laws, etc. all in the name of a hoax.
No further detail needed.
No further detail needed.
Well John, your question is rather terse and supposing, but I'll take it at face value and not as the bait that you apparently intend.
I'm old and don't deny that our Earthly environment has been badly damaged by mankind. I think that the advent of the oil age has caused most of this damage. Unfortunately, man (and this includes even those under age 50) is unable to come to an agreement as to what should be done about it. This is a frailty and sin of mankind. It is one that will ultimately be rectified when the oil age is over and economies collapse. This may not happen for another hundred years or so, but, inevitably, it will happen. Shortly after that fateful day the inhabitants of Earth will inherit the error of their forefathers via worldwide famine, pestilence, and war. I, for one, happen to believe that is according to God's decree as the price of man's sin. Furthermore, I believe that the Earth's environment will ultimately recover, but that may take another 2,000 years beyond the end of oil.
I pray for God's mercy, but I have given up on men in powerful positions who think they are god.
I'm old and don't deny that our Earthly environment has been badly damaged by mankind. I think that the advent of the oil age has caused most of this damage. Unfortunately, man (and this includes even those under age 50) is unable to come to an agreement as to what should be done about it. This is a frailty and sin of mankind. It is one that will ultimately be rectified when the oil age is over and economies collapse. This may not happen for another hundred years or so, but, inevitably, it will happen. Shortly after that fateful day the inhabitants of Earth will inherit the error of their forefathers via worldwide famine, pestilence, and war. I, for one, happen to believe that is according to God's decree as the price of man's sin. Furthermore, I believe that the Earth's environment will ultimately recover, but that may take another 2,000 years beyond the end of oil.
I pray for God's mercy, but I have given up on men in powerful positions who think they are god.
John, are you a grandparent? I believe in global climate change, and got into researching it because of my young grandson -- but I don't for a minute believe a "denier" loves their grandchildren any less because they hold that point of view.
Not a good question. I suggest deleting it.
Not a good question. I suggest deleting it.
I'm not over 50 but wow what an an amazing legacy we will leave for our grandchildren how can you argue against:
• Increased agricultural productivity & land (more rain, warmth & Co2)
• Longer growing seasons for all plant life
• Greening of some of the Earth's vast frozen land masses (Canada, Russia, China)
• Increased Co2 absorption rate
• Added habitat for wildlife
• More bountiful food for animal life
• Less food/energy requirements for animal life
• Less net global energy requirement for humans
• Less deforestation for heating fuel
• Less cold related severe weather and death
MOST IMPORTANTLY: if we are very lucky and warm enough, we may even avert the next ice age: Ice ages are not controversial ideas like global warming, they are real and acknowledged by all scientists regardless of political affiliation. They occur like clockwork, they appear very rapidly, within a few human generations, and wipe out most animal and plant life on the planet.
Before you say start abusing me please tell me why the above points wont be good for my grandchildren?
• Increased agricultural productivity & land (more rain, warmth & Co2)
• Longer growing seasons for all plant life
• Greening of some of the Earth's vast frozen land masses (Canada, Russia, China)
• Increased Co2 absorption rate
• Added habitat for wildlife
• More bountiful food for animal life
• Less food/energy requirements for animal life
• Less net global energy requirement for humans
• Less deforestation for heating fuel
• Less cold related severe weather and death
MOST IMPORTANTLY: if we are very lucky and warm enough, we may even avert the next ice age: Ice ages are not controversial ideas like global warming, they are real and acknowledged by all scientists regardless of political affiliation. They occur like clockwork, they appear very rapidly, within a few human generations, and wipe out most animal and plant life on the planet.
Before you say start abusing me please tell me why the above points wont be good for my grandchildren?
because they fall for nonsense like you clearly have without even flicking through a history book.
Go an google 'global cooling scare' and see what i mean.
"The ice age is coming, the sun's zooming in
Engines stop running, the wheat is growing thin
A nuclear error, but i have no fear
'cos London is drowning and i - i live by the river"
The Clash, "London Calling" 1979.
(London may have been drowning in 1979, but at the moment it seems fine HA!)
Go an google 'global cooling scare' and see what i mean.
"The ice age is coming, the sun's zooming in
Engines stop running, the wheat is growing thin
A nuclear error, but i have no fear
'cos London is drowning and i - i live by the river"
The Clash, "London Calling" 1979.
(London may have been drowning in 1979, but at the moment it seems fine HA!)