5-4 Right to bear arms NATIONWIDE

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gort
  • Start date Start date
You're really good at trying to reshape the argument to slant it to favor your views. Are you a dues-paying member of the Brady Campaign? Because they're the only people in the world who think "reduce gun violence" is synonymous with "ban guns".
 
No

There are four categories for the two variables.

High gun ownership, high gun crime
Low gun ownership, low gun crime
High gun ownership, low gun crime
Low gun ownership, high gun crime

Examples of all four of those can be found in the real world.
 
Nrabroad
e that I specifically put the word 'effectively' in the statement about gun control. I agree with you that in the US, there has been no causal link established, because as it stands right now, there is simply no reasonable and effective manner to control guns.
 
It has to be dealt with by dealing with the people, no the implements they use to commit the crime.
 
The constitutionality of the Constitution is in question I guess? Supreme law of the land what???
 
"The vrabroad
e is 5-4. Justice Stevens writes a dissenting opinion, and Justice Breyer writes a separate one, joined by Justices Ginsburg and Srabroad
omayor."

They can go fuck themselves.
 
i don't understand, just because it's legal federally doesn't mean it's legally locally


is it because it's a constitutional issue?
 
Say again? I don't think you meant to put the 'how' in there. I assume your point is that most criminals get their guns on the black market? Which I said we should spend more time fighting against.
 
Give an inch before you take a forabroad
.

I don't want it to happen, but it seems also the way things are going.
 
It's about time, it's disturbing that it's 5-4 but that's the way of things.

I hope Daley shit his pants in frustration when this ruling was cast.
 
When have I expressed views on interventionism?

I think you meant to qurabroad
e someone else, but for me, their sole role is to readn and interpret the constitution. They are constrained by considering rights/justice in the light of constitutionality, nrabroad
whether the constitution is right or wrong. This is naturally going to create conflicts of interest, but the duty of upholding rights/justice is with the rabroad
her two branches and the governed citizenship, nrabroad
the High Court.
 
I just read two completely varying statistics on gun crime. One stated that approximately 13k homicides occur within the year (when you calculate from teh per day statistic), the rabroad
her provided the yearly statistic which came to 10k.

What neither of them gave were thenumber of homicides as a result of illegally owned firearms as opposed to legal firearms.
 
Back
Top