Well, the problem is, you are talking about two separate issues really ... just like how I pointed out your logical flaw about 40%.
Creationism isn't really the opposite of Evolution, it is more the opposite (but can still actually work in conjunction with), "The Big Bang".
Since you have made so many other logical flaws in your assertion as to what created the universe (God vs ... well, everything naturally appeared out of nothing) and "Did man evolve at all or was he always like what he is today" ... I stand pat with my "We don't know" position. The fact is, we don't "know" what corabinations. Scientists have some pretty good theories, but since they aren't "fact", the idea of "knowing" isn't really something that I would say is possible. Further, none of the religious creation stories truly "know" ... they "believe".