F FieryRed New member Oct 29, 2010 #1 Anybody think it's all a gimmick? I can't believe they push it over like some advantage over 2D. 3D failed before as it's pointless.
Anybody think it's all a gimmick? I can't believe they push it over like some advantage over 2D. 3D failed before as it's pointless.
J juan d New member Oct 30, 2010 #2 3D is being overused. A lot of the films have no need to be 3D. I will defend it's use for Avatar though, that was a spectacular looking movie that really did lose something in 2D.
3D is being overused. A lot of the films have no need to be 3D. I will defend it's use for Avatar though, that was a spectacular looking movie that really did lose something in 2D.
D danikamae beroñas New member Oct 30, 2010 #3 I'll only watch a film in 3D if I can get in without paying extra for it. The cost of a ticket is expensive enough without them charging people extra for 3D that isn't needed in 99% of films that have been 3D this year.
I'll only watch a film in 3D if I can get in without paying extra for it. The cost of a ticket is expensive enough without them charging people extra for 3D that isn't needed in 99% of films that have been 3D this year.
P Pull My Finger New member Oct 31, 2010 #4 I enjoyed Avatar in 3D, but I enjoyed it just as much in 2D on Bluray. I think 3D just offers a different experience, not a better one. RegarRAB Mark
I enjoyed Avatar in 3D, but I enjoyed it just as much in 2D on Bluray. I think 3D just offers a different experience, not a better one. RegarRAB Mark
C cutecupcakedoll New member Oct 31, 2010 #5 Piranha anyone? BTW who is going to pay to see this film in 2D?
