That New Guy
New member
I'm not old enough to remember the original 3D crazes of the 50's and 60's...but I do remember the mini-resurgence of 3D in the 80's.
Stuff like Jaws 3D, Friday 13th 3D, Amytiville 3D, Parasite, Spacehunter, Metalstorm, Comin' at Ya, Treasure of the Four Crowns, Parasite...
Yes - the simple fact is the vast majority of 3D films were cheap, tacky tat. Because they needed a gimmick to make people go and see them...otherwise they would stay away in droves.
And there was a kind of rule of thumb that if you were going to make a movie in 3D and go to that trouble and expense (those early cameras were big and unweildy on set), well you needed to justify it by...shoving everything but the kitchen sink at the camera.
So...3D movies consisted of people throwing, holding, pointing or walking towarRAB the camera for no real discernible reason other than to show off the 3D.
If you ever see a 3D movie 'flat', you will know what I mean.
So now we are going through yet another phase...My Bloody Valentine etc, and James Cameron is filming Avatar in 3D.
But will it still be just the same old gimmick - will it be just excuses to throw things at the screen, position objects in the foreground etc...or will there be a genuine revolution and upgrade of the process that will add a whole new level to the cinemagoing experience?
With HD, Blu Ray etc, and HD capable TV's now available for the consumer and ever-increasing levels of technology in the wings, the advent of a 3D system that can be used not only in the cinema but also in the home, without the use of cumbersome silly glasses cannot be far away.
But the question is how will it be used to enhance and add to the viewing pleasure without it being gimmicky, as it always has been in the past?
Can 3D evolve beyond the 'chucking things at the screen' phase, and become something that is more subtle and adRAB to the general viewing experience?
Stuff like Jaws 3D, Friday 13th 3D, Amytiville 3D, Parasite, Spacehunter, Metalstorm, Comin' at Ya, Treasure of the Four Crowns, Parasite...
Yes - the simple fact is the vast majority of 3D films were cheap, tacky tat. Because they needed a gimmick to make people go and see them...otherwise they would stay away in droves.
And there was a kind of rule of thumb that if you were going to make a movie in 3D and go to that trouble and expense (those early cameras were big and unweildy on set), well you needed to justify it by...shoving everything but the kitchen sink at the camera.
So...3D movies consisted of people throwing, holding, pointing or walking towarRAB the camera for no real discernible reason other than to show off the 3D.
If you ever see a 3D movie 'flat', you will know what I mean.
So now we are going through yet another phase...My Bloody Valentine etc, and James Cameron is filming Avatar in 3D.
But will it still be just the same old gimmick - will it be just excuses to throw things at the screen, position objects in the foreground etc...or will there be a genuine revolution and upgrade of the process that will add a whole new level to the cinemagoing experience?
With HD, Blu Ray etc, and HD capable TV's now available for the consumer and ever-increasing levels of technology in the wings, the advent of a 3D system that can be used not only in the cinema but also in the home, without the use of cumbersome silly glasses cannot be far away.
But the question is how will it be used to enhance and add to the viewing pleasure without it being gimmicky, as it always has been in the past?
Can 3D evolve beyond the 'chucking things at the screen' phase, and become something that is more subtle and adRAB to the general viewing experience?