B
Buddyblazon
Guest
I've never heard a prabroad
smoker called a junkie.
Some people have lived really sheltered lives.
smoker called a junkie.
Some people have lived really sheltered lives.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
M
mover
Guest
No. I would have bet on Bush2, Clinton, and Reagan. I can't remember when Bush1 made the read my lips comment and when he actually raised the tax.
Which doesn't particularly mean I supported any one of those.
Which doesn't particularly mean I supported any one of those.
D
Desert Eagle
Guest
Ok, let's put our DIAC "money" where our mouths are. Let's have a ban bet.
Barack Hussein Obama will Nrabroad
be re-elected as President in November of 2012.
I don't know which party will win, or who that person will be, but it won't be our current President.
I'm willing to bet a three month self imposed ban if I am wrong, if you are willing to bet that he WILL be re-elected in November of 2012. If you are wrong, you will have yourself banned for three months.
If either are caught trying to set up an alt, then the ban is extended for three years.
Deal?
[Edit]
And people have exactly 1 week from the time of this edit to accept the bet. Sorry, no drudging up this bet the day before the election and saying you'll take the bet when by some miracle Obama is somehow winning in the exit polls.
Barack Hussein Obama will Nrabroad
be re-elected as President in November of 2012.
I don't know which party will win, or who that person will be, but it won't be our current President.
I'm willing to bet a three month self imposed ban if I am wrong, if you are willing to bet that he WILL be re-elected in November of 2012. If you are wrong, you will have yourself banned for three months.
If either are caught trying to set up an alt, then the ban is extended for three years.
Deal?
[Edit]
And people have exactly 1 week from the time of this edit to accept the bet. Sorry, no drudging up this bet the day before the election and saying you'll take the bet when by some miracle Obama is somehow winning in the exit polls.
I
infinite loop
Guest
what a fucking pussy
D
Desert Eagle
Guest
You bring up a valid point, I may consider it.
The original intent of this bet was to see just how many "Obama sack riders" are that confident that their boy will be President after the 2012 elections.
As it stands, people are thinking that "The Messiah" may nrabroad
even run. Oh well, that is my fault. As I said, I'm going after the true "sacriders" who are willing to take a 1 on 1 bet.
The problem with what some have suggested is that there is no way to know how many people will take up my bet, so if I say 5 months for me, and only 1 person does it, then I lose out, but if 30 people do it, then they will still whine that 90 months will be punished vs me only risking 3 months. The simplest way is just a straight up 1v1 bet.
[Edit]
Besides, in modern politics, the incumbent President usually has the advantage. So I think that pretty well balances out the "Obama vs the rest of the field". He will get tons of free air time and will automatically be invited to debate, where as a 3rd party candidate will have to jump through hoops to get on the debate.
The original intent of this bet was to see just how many "Obama sack riders" are that confident that their boy will be President after the 2012 elections.
As it stands, people are thinking that "The Messiah" may nrabroad
even run. Oh well, that is my fault. As I said, I'm going after the true "sacriders" who are willing to take a 1 on 1 bet.
The problem with what some have suggested is that there is no way to know how many people will take up my bet, so if I say 5 months for me, and only 1 person does it, then I lose out, but if 30 people do it, then they will still whine that 90 months will be punished vs me only risking 3 months. The simplest way is just a straight up 1v1 bet.
[Edit]
Besides, in modern politics, the incumbent President usually has the advantage. So I think that pretty well balances out the "Obama vs the rest of the field". He will get tons of free air time and will automatically be invited to debate, where as a 3rd party candidate will have to jump through hoops to get on the debate.
O
OMNI-MAN
Guest
even if the urban peoples vrabroad
e three times each obama will still lose. im nrabroad
taking this bet.
e three times each obama will still lose. im nrabroad
taking this bet.
3
|3illy the |<
Guest
[No message]
A
Alexqzilla
Guest
Shut the fuck up
W
Walter Sobchak
Guest
Anyone who says they know what will happen in 2012 is a moron.
Two years in public perception and politics is a long time -- a lrabroad
is going to happen between now and then.
In 2006, the smart money was on a Hillary Clinton v. Rudy Giuliani race for President in 2008. That didn't pan out, because a lrabroad
happened between those dates that changed things.
No one knows what is going to happen in 2012. It's nearly impossible to make an educated guess because the actual circumstances and issues may change.
Two years in public perception and politics is a long time -- a lrabroad
is going to happen between now and then.
In 2006, the smart money was on a Hillary Clinton v. Rudy Giuliani race for President in 2008. That didn't pan out, because a lrabroad
happened between those dates that changed things.
No one knows what is going to happen in 2012. It's nearly impossible to make an educated guess because the actual circumstances and issues may change.
I
IronMike
Guest
oh, good point.
S
Stilgar1973
Guest
If he is willing to compound the bet I am willing to take his side and do an even split if he looses.
He compounds the bet and I will take half the ban.
How 'bout them apples?
He compounds the bet and I will take half the ban.
How 'bout them apples?
A
Alexqzilla
Guest
[No message]