I'm talking about color choices on 2010/ 2011s RKCs, RGs, etc., not Screamin' Eagle Ultra or something.
RKCs need two-tone color schemes IMO usually (not talkin' purple or green).
Saw Sedona Orange RG today. Yeah, it's pretty. I agree Cool Blue would look sweet on a RG with no further necessary accents (I would embellish with gray or black, you know, Tar Heel style?) For me, a 2010 RG would be Scarlet Red, a 2011, Denim Black. But a Cool Blue RKC with no accents? Uh-uh. Me no buy. You see, the stock Harleys that I'm used to seeing over the years had some sweet paint jobs. All of 'em. Am I talking about the quality of paint? No. But it seems that Harley is afraid to go out on a limb stylistically for some of their biggest sellers (Sedona Orange notwithstanding.) I'm not in marketing...what do I know? Maybe there's greater risk right now by not appealing to the broadest coalition of interests, but bland color choices won't fatten profit margins for dealers if we moths aren't drawn to the proverbial flame.
Thus I play with the colors on the new bikes on the computer (C'mon Harley, gimme a job designing colors for new bikes!) Pictures of bikes in killer colors and combos will definitely stir up more interest in the next few years. Yeah, I know, who couldn't go on the computer and screw around with the color schemes? That's the point. If some schmuck like me can do it, so can you, Harley Davidson. I guess it all boils down to marketing.
For example, anybody with a 2010 RG like the 2-1 exhaust that came stock with the bike? The dealer today told it me that it was a sweet piece (as far as stock exhausts go), but customers complained because they wanted two pipes exiting for a balanced look, so they're back to 2-1-2 for 2011. Complain and get results, right?
Anyway, here's more of what I'm talkin' about in the way of embellishing on Harley's paint schemes (or lack thereof.)