I
ilikeminis
Guest
So I am looking to get my first motorcycle. I have been doing some research online, looking at other people's questions and answers. From what I have heard, it's risky to buy anything older than 10 years if you don't want to be doing a ton of work on it. I also have heard that for beginners, a good sized bike is around the 500cc or less range.
So I have been looking at Kawasaki Ninjas. I have looked up debates between the two, their pros and cons. From what I can tell, you can't really go wrong either way. So in ads I have come across two bikes that have interested me. A 2004 Kawasaki 250r and a 1997 Kawasaki EX500(Ninja 500). They both appear to be in good condition. I realize that actually riding these bikes it he best gauge to go by, but I would like to know what others think about the discrepancy in age of the bikes and which wey they think I should go on this. Both bikes are priced similarly.
So I have been looking at Kawasaki Ninjas. I have looked up debates between the two, their pros and cons. From what I can tell, you can't really go wrong either way. So in ads I have come across two bikes that have interested me. A 2004 Kawasaki 250r and a 1997 Kawasaki EX500(Ninja 500). They both appear to be in good condition. I realize that actually riding these bikes it he best gauge to go by, but I would like to know what others think about the discrepancy in age of the bikes and which wey they think I should go on this. Both bikes are priced similarly.