Search results

You underestimate the effect of heat retention compared to heat reflection. All major climate change has mostly been driven by the amount of heat that the atmosphere retains. What drives the heat-retaining quality of the atmosphere is the chemical composition of the atmosphere.

I don't know how you get from the report that the biodiversity is a "greater" risk than climate change other than an utterly thoughtless regurgitation of an inaccurate headline. The actual report cites climate change as one of the key drivers of loss of biodiversity. "The direct drivers of...

No. Actually several reviews have shown that climategate was nothing. In fact, Phil Jones is still Director of the CRU at the U of East Anglia -- it was proved he did nothing wrong. All climategate was, was the inability of non-scientists to follow the complex threads between scientists...

Actually, for the whole globe we are having record WARM temperatures. It is only because more populated areas are getting cold air this week that you get the impression that the earth has cooled. You can check it here: http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/ The average temperature on...

C. Socioeconomic

Religion is not found in the scientific journals. Look to the journals for the real research. Alternative solutions are tested and published monthly in the journals. Unfortunately no natural solution stands up to the test. Religion is faith-based, science is continually tested and the...

For one, the IPCC always used the term "climate change" from when it was first created in 1998, so the term is not new. Then the Bush administration purposely decided to start using the term "climate change" following the recommendation of conservative spin guru Frank Luntz. That now well-know...

http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/?source=pincl

Deforestation is one of the causes of global warming -- we are reducing the number of trees and plants the consume CO2, predominantly by cutting down the rain forests.

Use the ballot.

No. The whole purpose is to capture the total costs of decisions that companies make and to bring those costs into the decision-making process. If there is no damage caused to the world, then no costs should be attached to emitting greenhouse gasses. Only if a company is using a resource...

http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/?source=pincl

The IPCC has always called it Climate Change. In the U.S., the popularity of the "Climate Change" was iniated by the Bush Administration under the advice of Republican consultant Frank Luntz because in 2002 it sounds less frightening Read the memo. These were the Republican talking points...

The IPCC has always called it Climate Change. In the U.S., the popularity of the "Climate Change" was iniated by the Bush Administration under the advice of Republican consultant Frank Luntz because in 2002 it sounds less frightening Read the memo. These were the Republican talking points...

The IPCC has always called it Climate Change. The memo you refer to is the Luntz memo in 2003. He's a communication consultant and in a memo to the White House, he recommended the Republicans use "Climate Change" because "'Climate change' is less frightening than 'global warming.' ...While...

The IPCC has always called it Climate Change. The memo you refer to is the Luntz memo in 2003. He's a communication consultant and in a memo to the White House, he recommended the Republicans use "Climate Change" because "'Climate change' is less frightening than 'global warming.' ...While...

The IPCC has always called it Climate Change. The memo you refer to is the Luntz memo in 2003. He's a communication consultant and in a memo to the White House, he recommended the Republicans use "Climate Change" because "'Climate change' is less frightening than 'global warming.' ...While...

Nope. There is no debate about whether humans are causing it anymore. The only debate is how best to implement a solution. The debate is happening right now at the U.N. climate talks in Bangkok. The world is working on a worldwide treaty, hopefully agreed to in December in Copenhagen. The...

Stop talking generalities and give specifics. In exactly what other 100 year period did temperatures rise so quickly. Clearly an educated, rational person would not compare warming that happened in a 100 year period to other periods that took tens of thousands of years to warm the same amount...

My answer to your question: 42