Search results

References: - in Matthew 27:34 "mingled" drink is vinegar + gall. - in Mark 15:23 the "mingled" drink is wine + myrrh. - in Galatians 4 such things are an "allegory" Could such allegorically be grace + law, which is allegorically (as if) blessed + cursed = accursed, and in the worse case...

Eg: Blessed + Cursed = "Accursed": Galatians 1:8,9 Eg: Life + Death = a "Grave" subject: John 5:29,29 So Sweet + Bitter ought not be mingled: James 3:11 Such becomes both Savlation + Destruction: Jude 1:5 What got "mingled" in Exodus 9 was "very grievous". "Law worketh Wrath" can get very...

Genesis 2:16's grace is of God. Genesis 2:17's law is not of God. If mingled they make an oxy-moron: every tree vs not every tree harmless vs harmful grace vs law contrary things

...would NOT receive? Genesis 2:16 is "of God": 1Corinthians 2:12, but Genesis 2:17 is not of God: Romans 8:15. - 2:16 = "every tree", "freely": "harmless" Grace: Above - 2:17 = not every tree, "surely die": harmful Law: Under (if plural God's Genesis 1:6-8 under/above division applied) If...

...would NOT receive? Genesis 2:16 is "of God": 1Corinthians 2:12, but Genesis 2:17 is not of God: Romans 8:15. - 2:16 = "every tree", "freely": "harmless" Grace: Above - 2:17 = not every tree, "surely die": harmful Law: Under (if plural God's Genesis 1:6-8 under/above division applied) If...

...would NOT receive? Genesis 2:16 is "of God": 1Corinthians 2:12, but Genesis 2:17 is not of God: Romans 8:15. - 2:16 = "every tree", "freely": "harmless" Grace: Above - 2:17 = not every tree, "surely die": harmful Law: Under (if plural God's Genesis 1:6-8 under/above division applied) If...

...2:15's singular "approved"? How does blame game shame of plural "Christians" at Antioch1 differ from converted Peter's note a "Christian" has no shame? How does Mt 25:31-33's left/right division has no peace, differ from Gen 1:6-8's under/above has peace "above"? Could it have something to...

Galatians 4 (paraphrased): Abraham had two sons by two mothers, which (law/grace) things are an allegory

God's Christ would not receive? Matthew 27:34 They gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted [thereof], he would not drink. Mark 15:23 And they gave him to drink wine mingled with myrrh: but he received [it] not.

nice try, but there's no flaws when no laws Romans 4:15 where no law, there no f-law Romans 5:13 when no law, then no f-law Romans 7:6 we are delivered from the f-law Romans 8:1 THEREFORE there is now no f-law Romans 10:4 Christ is the end of the f-law 2Corinthians 5:19 no f-law, no, not...

...good (grace) + evil (law)? Hint1: JC would not receive the "mingled" drink Matthew 27:34... Mark 15:23... Luke 13:1-3 Hint2: Mingled good + evil is as grace + law addead Genesis 2: 16 + 17(the law given by Moses: Jn 1:17) Hint3: Use all five of your God given senses to discern (a-void)...

...contrary things don't mingle? Law Boy comes first, then Grace Boy comes afterward, b/c Law Boy was like Hell Boy. John 1:17 The law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. Luke 16:15 The law and the prophets were until John, but since that time the kingdom of God is...

Plan A: After, Above, Approved, Accepted... Grace Plan B: Before, Beneath, Bondage, Bewitched...Law Grace: I will never leave you, nor ever forsake you - Friend. Law: I will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you - Enmity Grace: That God is light, and in him there is no darkness at all...

- if what LORD God commanded man is a paradox: Genesis 2:16 - every tree, freely given... Grace Genesis 2:17 - not every tree, surely die... LAW You can't disobey Gen 2:16 Grace by itself, and you can't obey Gen 2:16 when Gen 2:17 addead. - if God vs LORD commanded Noah differently: God said...

instead of James Peter or John? It seems there was more than a little disputation among top apostles and Paul. It seems even when 11 became a new 12 again, they were still a dirty dozen. It seems Peter kept dissimulating at Antioch where they were called Christians. It seems epistle James sent...

...black Sabbath pictured in Revelation? open to anyone, since there is no partiality with God; but more specifically asked to Seventh day Adventists

"ways": differ from God is one? Jesus noted this in John 5:18 not one jot or tittle of law will cease until dualism (heaven + earth) ends, and law worketh wrath can get nasty to the point all kindreds of earth wail Is it time to end dualism: good and evil life and death heaven and earth...

Is it wise to desire troubled water, and after already suffering so l-o-n-g. Why didn't JC help him into the troubled water; But rather healed him with seven grace us words. And why did JC also say "sin (law) no more", after finding him in the law temple praising the law again? Could turn back...

...it's deadly wound get healed? Could it have something to do with many still having sacrifice, and not mercy; instead of mercy, and not sacrifice? Sacrifice, which is of the law, is it beastiality? Could it also have something to do with many still having a partiality sides wars, not peace...

smites, feel about Rev 1:7? Revelation 1:7 ALL kindreds SHALL WAIL "because of him" Note: the Lamb in Revelation isn't the 'amnos" Lamb, (the 'amnos' Lamb "taketh away the sin of the world") but rather the 'arnion' Lamb who bites and smites with a sharp twoedged swordy mouth, to the point ALL...