Search results

as individual years, yet....? ........that polar area is so cold that they NEVER have thaws that would create such freeze-thaw layers. So what is their rebuttal to that scientific fact? (Obviously, this YEC argument is an effort to deny an earth age older than 6,000+ years.) [Yes, I know...

geologists who explore...? .......for oil? It seems like a geologist having a correct understanding of earth history and unencumbered by wrong ideas like a 4.7 billion year old earth and uniformitarism would have a TREMENDOUS ADVANTAGE. Has this been the case...

geologists who explore...? .......for oil? It seems like a geologist having a correct understanding of earth history and unencumbered by wrong ideas like a 4.7 billion year old earth and uniformitarism would have a TREMENDOUS ADVANTAGE. Has this been the case...

original publications but eventually...? .....developed a nearly fanatical following which somehow concluded that it was a uniquely "inspired translation" like no other?

original publications but eventually...? .....developed a nearly fanatical following which somehow concluded that it was a uniquely "inspired translation" like no other?

rant on tangents of their own? Is it simply a desire to use R&S to promote their personal views *OR* do most participants simply have atrocious reading comprehension skills (or both)? =================================================================== Some people will tend to reply with a...

side (from which Eve..? ....was formed)?

...original creation of man........? ....... that is, from the dust of the ground, it is simply referring to inorganic material in general, i.e., chemical compounds and elements.......... and NOT NECESSARILY direct creation of Adam from soil (i.e. the dust of the ground)? I wonder because in...

...they ignorant of scripture or..? .....was it simply a case of incorporating all "nativity story" elements into one picture? ====================== Obviously, the Wise Men visited Jesus and his family a couple of years after his birth.

...to complain that BBT....? .........was inherently theistic because a scientific declaration that the universe had a beginning [as Stephen Hawking emphasized in his A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME] leads to the natural conclusion that a moment of creation implies a creator? Why or why not?

...to complain that BBT....? .........was inherently theistic because a scientific declaration that the universe had a beginning [as Stephen Hawking emphasized in his A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME] leads to the natural conclusion that a moment of creation implies a creator? Why or why not?

anything their told"? Is "dilution" of minds a major problem in our time? (And does this "dilution" lead to believing anything THEY ARE TOLD or THEIR TOLD? I wonder because I find it fascinating that those who are the first to deplore the ignorance of others seem so often to be prone to...

28:19's explicit statement? “baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19). ==================================== Yes: "name" is in the singular. (Not sure if you are making that point facetiously but thanks.)

renunciation" of evolution are myths? ===================== How does one go about "prostrating" something?

votes? Yes, some questions involve very subjective topics and therefore the answers are equally subjective (and/or downright hostile). But I find it amazing that even the most objective types of information-seeking questions lead to insightful and factually-correct answers which nevertheless...

each creation day was 24hr, how.? .......could Adam have had enough time to name thousands of animals on a single 24hr day (Day #6) --- especially such a busy day wherein the animals were created first and then Adam was created, and he slept for a while so that God could remove a rib and make...

...Quirinius Census & apparent.....? .....contradictions such as 1 Kings 7.26 & 2 Chronicles 4:5 concerning the volume of the molten sea in Solomon's temple (2000 baths vs. 3000 baths)? (Just to cite a few examples.) Wouldn't the typical cut-and-paste "Bible error lists" be taken more...

Example from http://scienceagainstevolution.org/v10i10f.htm : "We know that carbon 14 dating is totally irrelevant to the theory of evolution. Knowledgeable evolutionists don’t claim that carbon 14 dating has anything to do with the theory of evolution. Ignorant evolutionists, however, think...

complaining that ......? .......the " concept of something coming from nothing is absurd"? I thought EX NIHILO was a fundamental doctrine of Christianity.

impossible because "something can't.....? ......come from nothing" when that is exactly what the Christian doctrine of EX NIHILO has always claimed about the creation of the universe? ========================================================= EXPLORING THE DETAILS: So I don't get it (which is...