The true-believers who listen to algore, and sights like wikipedia, or their personal political websites as proof?
Or the skeptic's who believe that the scientific method should be used, and all non-corrupted (I.E. altered) non-manipulated data should be used and made completely transparent and...
Mostly it has just funneled billions of dollars away from pollution and environment clean up, to the pockets of the Church of global warming leaders such as algore.
The only reason we are nonbelievers is because that pesky science gets in the way. Unfortunately for you true believers, when science is involved AGW is not supported. But i do support your right to "believe".
The new strategy is to say everything you have listed is a myth.
Everything you listed are facts.
They can not dispute them with science so they say they are myths.
When you look at AGW from a physics point of view,
CO2 doesn't do what it is supposed too.
What have the proponents of global warming figured out to counter physics in the AGW argument.