Search results

  1. J

    Which side of the global warming 'debate' cares more about facts and reality?

    The true-believers who listen to algore, and sights like wikipedia, or their personal political websites as proof? Or the skeptic's who believe that the scientific method should be used, and all non-corrupted (I.E. altered) non-manipulated data should be used and made completely transparent and...
  2. J

    What effects has climate change already had on the world?

    Mostly it has just funneled billions of dollars away from pollution and environment clean up, to the pockets of the Church of global warming leaders such as algore.
  3. J

    Are those who don't believe in Climate Change...?

    The only reason we are nonbelievers is because that pesky science gets in the way. Unfortunately for you true believers, when science is involved AGW is not supported. But i do support your right to "believe".
  4. J

    Capitalism as we know it today is inherently harmful to the environment?

    Keep saying its not communism until you believe.
  5. J

    Why do the IPCC and governments tell us the GW debate is over when so many

    The new strategy is to say everything you have listed is a myth. Everything you listed are facts. They can not dispute them with science so they say they are myths.
  6. J

    Should physics be kept out of the anthropogenic global warming debate?

    When you look at AGW from a physics point of view, CO2 doesn't do what it is supposed too. What have the proponents of global warming figured out to counter physics in the AGW argument.
Back
Top