Do right wing Christian Theocrats ever read what the Founding Fathers ACTUALLY said?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nemesis_152
  • Start date Start date
eh, i'm willing to bet they're a tiny, tiny minority of people, which would be covered in "few, if any"


they certainly aren't shaping much political doctrine.
 
God, I fucking hate Sarah Palin, not only because she's dumb as fuck herself, but she's brought other fucking morons out of the woodwork to cheer her stupidity and ignorance on.

It's not a coincidence that retardation runs in her genetic code.
 
a thread about right wing religious zealots and clownfart in on page 1 trolling. what a shock
 
since the state gave them their rights, the state decided that their labor for common good was more important then their rights and worked them to death.
 
To answer the first question, the religious right zealots ignore anything and everything that doesn't support their agenda, similar to the left. They simply pretend it doesn't exist. Not every founding father was an atheist but they all recognized the importance of having NO national religious institution or the endorsement thereof.

The morons on the right ignore this, the morons on the left dig up quotes (see video) that show christian beliefs being bad mouthed by the founders.
 
The founding father's knew the difference between dogma and the innate qualities of human needs in relationship to a power greater than themselves.

Palin is incorrect. The founding father's based their perspective on the observable appreciation of what serves mankind most congruently. They used prior failure and successes be the guide. The result: A balance allowing an existence between the power of the people, the individual, and the power which enables both to be.
 
They are not divine, but we have a system that was setup so that we the people could affect change. Instead we have politicians who want to undermine our system and way of government, so while they weren't divine the system they built is pretty good fi we use it as intended.
 
seriously though without some sort of deist construct in the document then the whole intent of the document falls apart.

if god gives you your rights then it will take god coming down out of the sky on his chariot of fire slinging lightning at the capital building to revoke them.

if on the other hand government gives you your rights, then all it takes is an act of government and our supreme court upholding the law to revoke any of your rights. not that this hasn't been happening for the last 100 years
 
People are too worried about backing up their opinions with the opinions of an authority figure like "the founders".

People need to learn how to argue an idea for its own fucking merits. Stand up for logic and reason.

People are scared to hold an intellectual position anymore. We've torn down the individuals self esteem and replaced it with spinelessness.
 
People


People



People



People


People



People


[move]

People


People



People


[move]

People


People



People


[move]

People


People



People


[/move]

People


People



People



[/move]
People


People



People


[/move]

People


People



People




People


People



People
 
Intentional repetition, signifying a rhythmic lashing, the intent to beat this into the heads of the masses.
 
Certain people shouldn't be allowed to interact with me, they are below it.

The world should work in the same fashion as it worked in Indiana Jones when the unworthy looked into the Ark of the Covenant. Faces should melt when I speak and unwashed fools chance to hear.
 
Palin getting owned who would have though but most founding fathers had more of an agonist belief than religious belief
 
Back
Top