Would it be moral to create a smarter and stronger human specie by using...

[Dreamer of ecstacy]

...artificial selection?
Hitler did it with one race. But you could always mix africans with asians to make a strong and smart human. We do it with dogs, is that not also immoral?

 

[Dear Leader]

no it would be immoral, if you made a super human then it would undermine equality and democracy since it would undermine the idea that we are all equal
and if you can breed super humans, you could always breed inferior humans to use as slaves, so its a slippery slope downwards

 

[Barachel Noetic]

Not if you did it like Hitler, for course he had no basis to his claim.

 

[Long Lost Cousin]

Your experiments would create an army of Tiger Woods.
When you choose a mate, you by extension choose what your children will look like, and your contribution to what traits you would like to pass on to the future of the world. Selection.

 

[oldandtired]

Means someone is playing god which means freedom dies.

 

[Barachel Noetic]

Not if you did it like Hitler, for course he had no basis to his claim.

 

[Ronie]

you mean like the hulk you stupid fool the atheist idiots aka artificial intelligence will be experimented by mad scientists then the real intelligent scientists will be a survivor - moment of truth if you will follow my instruction

 

[TheMadProfessor]

Hitler had an idea from creating a master race thru eugenics too...seems I recall that didn't work out too well.

 

[Mike]

Yes. People do this naturally when selecting a mate, short fat bald men aren't popular with the ladies.

 

[Hybiscus]

hitler tried and failed. his experiments in eugenics failed. all he did was produce blondes, not smarter people

 

[Meh.]

So eugenics? No. That sort of thing is the main reason that we think of Hitler as not being a very nice chap.

Edit: You win an internet if you can guess how many human rights it would violate.