Why wouldn't gays boycott locales, where homosexuality is illegal?

????

New member
Although homosexuality itself is perfectly legal in all of these places, gays still boycott the entire Utah (because of Mormon's support of California's "Proposition 8") and Rushville, IL because a sheriff made "anti-gay remarks" on Facebook:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_boycotts#Gay_and_lesbian.2C_bisexual.2C_and_transgendered_boycotts

But places, where "sodomy" is outright illegal, seem perfectly acceptable to this crowd:
<<
Gay Caribbean cruises have been popular for several years despite hostility to homosexuality on certain islands, especially in Jamaica, Barbados and the Cayman Islands.
>> http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CB_DOMINICA_GAY_CRUISE_ARRESTS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-03-21-17-53-20

Why would a homosexual avoid going to Utah (such as to ski), but still go to Barbados or St. Lucia for a cruise?
Ingsoc1, let me rephrase my question -- why hasn't a single major gay organization even called for a boycott of these islands? They have called for a boycott of Utah -- even if not all gays observe it...
Jaker, in St. Lucia, for example, a couple of gays can be BEATEN TO DEATH by the people on the street if they observed as holding hands or some such "display of affection"... Police would do them a favor by arresting them -- I discussed this with our cleaning lady at a resort over there. And yet, no calls for boycotting the island can be heard -- why?
 
Back
Top