Luiz Carlos
New member
word "apostasy" for its ..? ..members?
Jehovah's Witnesses are taught to hate all apostates, avoid all literatures, and thus, by labeling someone an apostate, it is forbidden to have any dealings with this person.
However, the apostle Paul was accused of apostasy (Acts 21: 21) By approving the apostle Paul?
Now if the word apostasy is HORRIBLE, by accepting the Paul apostle?
King Solomon had committed apostasy. “Insight 3 pg 22” says: "The Israeli apostates .. For example, King Solomon built high places to Molech and other deities .."
Why do not eliminate the books written by Solomon (Ecclesiastes, Proverbs, etc.).?
And why eliminated the excellent books written with aid by Raymond Franz (“Comments to the Letter of James” and “Aid to Bible Understanding”) And Why the books of Solomon( Proverbs Ecclesiastes, etc) not eliminated for the Watchtower?
All conferences and literature of Jehovah's Witnesses are quoted in the writings of Solomon.
But the excellent books that Raymond Franz participated, no. Why?
If Solomon committed apostasy ( ecumenism and unfaithfulness ) to Jehovah, what about the Watchtower Society who participated in the UN ,"the eighth king of Revelation," for 10 years ?, according to reporter Stephen Bates of “The Guardian” of England, in 08/10/2001. Stephen Bates is not an apostate.
We note that the Association does not explain the two sides of the coin because he fears being criticized by any member that mimics his "apostasy" of the Apostle Paul to her.
But to omit a clear biblical explanation, this is honest attitude of Watchtower Society?
But it is fair to imply only the bad side of the word apostasy?
But it is fair to prohibit its members from applying the principles of 1 John 4: 1 ?
what is prove that the teachings and stay only with the teachings that are in harmony with the Bible?
Why a Jehovah's Witness who accepts a teaching differs from type "day of Jehovah, .. the end of Christendom. Come in the twentieth century" must be condemned as an apostate?
See the book "The Nations Shall Know That I Am Jehovah - How? p. 200" and compare Deut. 18: 20 - 22.
It means that if you disclose such unscriptural teaching without questioning it is pleasing to the Lord just because he has to obey without question the Watchtower Society and it can not apply the principles of the 1 John 4: 1 in such teaching?
And what about when the Association rents its buildings for activities which violate Biblical principles of Jehovah's Witnesses? That would not be an apostate from the Association?
So Solomon and Paul are there for all Jehovah's Witnesses approve their writings, however, that the witnesses HATE all apostates in general? Why not explain this to the nuances of the word apostasy as we just saw?
Jehovah's Witnesses are taught to hate all apostates, avoid all literatures, and thus, by labeling someone an apostate, it is forbidden to have any dealings with this person.
However, the apostle Paul was accused of apostasy (Acts 21: 21) By approving the apostle Paul?
Now if the word apostasy is HORRIBLE, by accepting the Paul apostle?
King Solomon had committed apostasy. “Insight 3 pg 22” says: "The Israeli apostates .. For example, King Solomon built high places to Molech and other deities .."
Why do not eliminate the books written by Solomon (Ecclesiastes, Proverbs, etc.).?
And why eliminated the excellent books written with aid by Raymond Franz (“Comments to the Letter of James” and “Aid to Bible Understanding”) And Why the books of Solomon( Proverbs Ecclesiastes, etc) not eliminated for the Watchtower?
All conferences and literature of Jehovah's Witnesses are quoted in the writings of Solomon.
But the excellent books that Raymond Franz participated, no. Why?
If Solomon committed apostasy ( ecumenism and unfaithfulness ) to Jehovah, what about the Watchtower Society who participated in the UN ,"the eighth king of Revelation," for 10 years ?, according to reporter Stephen Bates of “The Guardian” of England, in 08/10/2001. Stephen Bates is not an apostate.
We note that the Association does not explain the two sides of the coin because he fears being criticized by any member that mimics his "apostasy" of the Apostle Paul to her.
But to omit a clear biblical explanation, this is honest attitude of Watchtower Society?
But it is fair to imply only the bad side of the word apostasy?
But it is fair to prohibit its members from applying the principles of 1 John 4: 1 ?
what is prove that the teachings and stay only with the teachings that are in harmony with the Bible?
Why a Jehovah's Witness who accepts a teaching differs from type "day of Jehovah, .. the end of Christendom. Come in the twentieth century" must be condemned as an apostate?
See the book "The Nations Shall Know That I Am Jehovah - How? p. 200" and compare Deut. 18: 20 - 22.
It means that if you disclose such unscriptural teaching without questioning it is pleasing to the Lord just because he has to obey without question the Watchtower Society and it can not apply the principles of the 1 John 4: 1 in such teaching?
And what about when the Association rents its buildings for activities which violate Biblical principles of Jehovah's Witnesses? That would not be an apostate from the Association?
So Solomon and Paul are there for all Jehovah's Witnesses approve their writings, however, that the witnesses HATE all apostates in general? Why not explain this to the nuances of the word apostasy as we just saw?