Why is the EPA/censorship story being replayed ad nauseum on mainstream media outlets?

Is it because this is the first time such censorship has happened? I imagine if they had more examples they'd be reporting in in the press.
*they'd be reporting *them in the press.
Jimmbo: I'm not condoning censorship. I'm suggesting this must be a one time occurrence, considering it's been prime time news every day this past week.
 
Media people do a lot of traveling. They've seen that the lack of warming isn't the case only in their cities, as Dana suggests, but is widespread.

I think deep inside, a lot of maintstream media people who have carried Al Gore's water for 15 years on this issue are noticing that it continues not to warm, even though Hansen said it would, are privately questioning global warming, and see right through the "it's really climate change" claptrap.
 
Back
Top