...Young to represent him? Sandler is the legal hit-man for the Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
Sandler's role for CAIR has been to intimidate people who dare to expose the goals and actions of Islamofascists. For example, last year he tried to get Jihad expert Robert Spencer banned from speaking to the Young American Foundation by using a threatening letter. Sandler followed up by threatening columnist Mike Adams for writing about the Spencer incident.
The question is, why would a guy who wants to assume the role of Commander-in-Chief select a lawyer with terrorist connections to represent him in a law suit?
This is just another of those "guilt by associations" that Obama dismisses as a "distraction" and the mainstream media chooses to ignore.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=76933
Chronos-- that is only your opinion and I am spreading the word since the MSM won't.
So you are calling CAIR a terrorist organization?
Maybe you should tell the DOJ...But they will not listen, because CAIR is an organiation, recognized by the president for the work they do representing Islam to America.
More lies and innuendo, try again, but thanks for the 2 points. In the meantime get used to hearing...
I hadn't heard that. Thanks for the link. But are you really surprised? CAIR is a corrupt terrorist-sympathizing group. I cannot believe 7 years after 9/11, we're having to worry about having people connected with radical Islam in our highest offices. Nothing surprises me about Obama's 'closet' anymore or the fact that Americans will excuse it.
"We're dealing with the U.S. Constitution and it must be followed," Berg explained. "I want the Constitution enforced; that's my main reason for doing this.
"The real outrage is that there's nothing in our system that provides that a candidate must provide that his qualifications are true and correct before he or she runs, and that safeguard should be put into our system by law," Berg said.
I agree with Berg. Step up to the plate with the real documents!
First - to argue that the use of a lawyer ties you to every client that lawyer has ever had is asinine in the extreme. If that was the case no lawyer who ever lost would ever get another client.
Second - CAIR is not a terrorist association. Jum[ping from "Islamic" to "terrorist" shows a special sort of ignorance.
You had my attention until you hit "Islamofascists." You obviously have no idea what fascism is. If you did, you'd never use that Neo-Con smear as it is totally devoid of any meaning whatsoever.
And World Net Daily? Puh-leeze! That makes Fox Noise or Newsmax look "fair and balanced!"
