phillipk_1959
New member
Its is all Poltical tricks.
Why does the myth stay around that Global Climate Change is Man Made?
- Thread starter phillipk_1959
- Start date
zipadedodazipadea
New member
It's on the way out. The science is building up against it and already refutes it for any sane human being. Liberals are just slower that the average person.
sumrtanman
New member
Yea.I believe that cows farting and S.U.V.'s caused the last ice age to recede from the U.S. I think they are saying 50 million years ago. Al Gore is a radical liar. He is getting rich off all the Bull-s**t he's been telling,and you non-thinking believe him. I wish we were having global warming. It was cold here in Va. today. I wish it was 90 degrees.
BrunoGiordano
New member
Not another conspiracy theorist?!
98% of scientists involved with climatology and relevant other sciences agree the the impetus toward climate change is because of man. The trouble is that news media gave about the same amount of coverage to the naysayers as they did toward the 98% who felt the proof overwhelmingly leaned toward a man made problem. Many of the naysayers have been proved to have been given money from the oil companies which really makes these scientists look biased and a lot of their science was way off base.
The media, of course, created the pseudo science by over emphasizing the 2% and giving them equal time as the 98%. Faulty news, faulty views.
There is ample science to conclude that it is not our Sun creating this problem just as our Sun did not create the holes in our ozone layer that, by the way, has nought to do with climate change with the exception of dangerous levels of UV radiation.
This is really old stuff, Phil.
Bruno Wiskel changed his mind on many things. He's not that coherent. Have you read his book?
By the way the real title of his book is "The Emperor’s New Climate
ebunking the Myths of Global Warming"
Please note that the "The Emperor’s New Climate:Myths of Global Warming" NOT "The Myth of Global Warming". Big difference here.
What Allegre really said.
Incidentally, the Morano article also cites a profile in Canada's National Post as further evidence of Allegre's new-found scepticism. It doesn't offer much new - it cites the same LÉxpress article, though it uses quotation more honestly and describes Allegre's position not so much as that of a a climate change denier (though it is part of a series called The Deniers), but as someone fustrated at the hysteria that has congealed around global warming:
Dr. Allegre especially despairs at "the greenhouse-gas fanatics whose proclamations consist in denouncing man's role on the climate without doing anything about it except organizing conferences and preparing protocols that become dead letters." The world would be better off, Dr. Allegre believes, if these "denouncers" became less political and more practical, by proposing practical solutions to head off the dangers they see, such as developing technologies to sequester C02.
There is a lot of nonsense hear. I'm not going to deal with it item by item.
Please show me the evidence of mammoths in Antarctica.
98% of scientists involved with climatology and relevant other sciences agree the the impetus toward climate change is because of man. The trouble is that news media gave about the same amount of coverage to the naysayers as they did toward the 98% who felt the proof overwhelmingly leaned toward a man made problem. Many of the naysayers have been proved to have been given money from the oil companies which really makes these scientists look biased and a lot of their science was way off base.
The media, of course, created the pseudo science by over emphasizing the 2% and giving them equal time as the 98%. Faulty news, faulty views.
There is ample science to conclude that it is not our Sun creating this problem just as our Sun did not create the holes in our ozone layer that, by the way, has nought to do with climate change with the exception of dangerous levels of UV radiation.
This is really old stuff, Phil.
Bruno Wiskel changed his mind on many things. He's not that coherent. Have you read his book?
By the way the real title of his book is "The Emperor’s New Climate
ebunking the Myths of Global Warming" Please note that the "The Emperor’s New Climate:Myths of Global Warming" NOT "The Myth of Global Warming". Big difference here.
What Allegre really said.
Incidentally, the Morano article also cites a profile in Canada's National Post as further evidence of Allegre's new-found scepticism. It doesn't offer much new - it cites the same LÉxpress article, though it uses quotation more honestly and describes Allegre's position not so much as that of a a climate change denier (though it is part of a series called The Deniers), but as someone fustrated at the hysteria that has congealed around global warming:
Dr. Allegre especially despairs at "the greenhouse-gas fanatics whose proclamations consist in denouncing man's role on the climate without doing anything about it except organizing conferences and preparing protocols that become dead letters." The world would be better off, Dr. Allegre believes, if these "denouncers" became less political and more practical, by proposing practical solutions to head off the dangers they see, such as developing technologies to sequester C02.
There is a lot of nonsense hear. I'm not going to deal with it item by item.
Please show me the evidence of mammoths in Antarctica.
Al Gore's personal worth has gone from 2 million when he left the Vice Presidency to 100 million. Most of that has been made off of "green technologies." Imagine what the people at the top have made? And we're just getting started.
Global warming is a means of control dreamed up by The Club of Rome.
It's a means of control over us that will control what we eat, where we go, how we go there and nearly everything we do. Control will be in the hands of an unelected international ruling body. Stripping away national sovereignty and personal freedom. Avenues of recourse will be few.
It's a means to a money making and political end.
Global warming is a means of control dreamed up by The Club of Rome.
It's a means of control over us that will control what we eat, where we go, how we go there and nearly everything we do. Control will be in the hands of an unelected international ruling body. Stripping away national sovereignty and personal freedom. Avenues of recourse will be few.
It's a means to a money making and political end.