...would NOT receive? Genesis 2:16 is "of God": 1Corinthians 2:12,
but Genesis 2:17 is not of God: Romans 8:15.
- 2:16 = "every tree", "freely": "harmless" Grace: Above
- 2:17 = not every tree, "surely die": harmful Law: Under
(if plural God's Genesis 1:6-8 under/above division applied)
If mingled: every tree + not every tree = oxy-MORON.
So then, Christ would not received the "mingled" drink;
For to obey law (2:17) would be to dis-obey grace (2:16),
and to mingle contrary things would be bi-polar dis-order,
and being "doubleminded" = "unstable" = has plural "ways".
Eg: God is not [the author] of con-fusion, but of peace.
Eg: "God" is not "the LORD" in the Noah's Ark allegory; For
God + LORD give Noah plural and contrary commandments; So
Christ abolished the law (enmity) of (plural) commandments: Eph 2:15
Eg: Christ is the end of the law: Romans 10:4 = our peace,
refused the "mingled" drink: Matthew 27:43 & Mark 15:23
but Genesis 2:17 is not of God: Romans 8:15.
- 2:16 = "every tree", "freely": "harmless" Grace: Above
- 2:17 = not every tree, "surely die": harmful Law: Under
(if plural God's Genesis 1:6-8 under/above division applied)
If mingled: every tree + not every tree = oxy-MORON.
So then, Christ would not received the "mingled" drink;
For to obey law (2:17) would be to dis-obey grace (2:16),
and to mingle contrary things would be bi-polar dis-order,
and being "doubleminded" = "unstable" = has plural "ways".
Eg: God is not [the author] of con-fusion, but of peace.
Eg: "God" is not "the LORD" in the Noah's Ark allegory; For
God + LORD give Noah plural and contrary commandments; So
Christ abolished the law (enmity) of (plural) commandments: Eph 2:15
Eg: Christ is the end of the law: Romans 10:4 = our peace,
refused the "mingled" drink: Matthew 27:43 & Mark 15:23