P
Poyzin
Guest
...used to be "forest fires"? Only one of three explanations can be behind this change in phrasiology:
1. People can't prevent forest fires, but they CAN prevent wild fires
OR
2. People can prevent both forest fires and wild fires, but the ad only focuses on wild fires
OR
3. There is a change in definition as to what constitutes forest fires vs. wild fires since the original ads from 40 years ago. I would think that if anything, people can prevent forest fires more than wild fires, because wild fires are started by lightening right?
Personally, I think it's nonsense to say that only one person or even all of humanity can prevent either a forest fire or a wild fire. They have happened since trees existed.
1. People can't prevent forest fires, but they CAN prevent wild fires
OR
2. People can prevent both forest fires and wild fires, but the ad only focuses on wild fires
OR
3. There is a change in definition as to what constitutes forest fires vs. wild fires since the original ads from 40 years ago. I would think that if anything, people can prevent forest fires more than wild fires, because wild fires are started by lightening right?
Personally, I think it's nonsense to say that only one person or even all of humanity can prevent either a forest fire or a wild fire. They have happened since trees existed.