Cool, Billy Jack just one problem most of the references to Al seem to come from deniers, most of the things I see presentered here from those who represent the AGW side are science based and present science links to back what they say. what I assume is your side present blogs and the proven lies of people like Lord Monckton, a true shyster.
Larry - Some cool attempts at insults there dude, but given you start your statement with the claim of cooling since 1995 when even most deniers claim 1998 as the peak, you do realize 1998 is after 1995 don't you, and the fact that 2005 has surpassed 1998 and that 2010 tied with 2005, sadly I think it pretty obvious who has the learning disability.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.gif
Thie above shows 1995, it is well below 1998 and had an anomaly of ~0.38c, global averages are now over 0.6c that is an increase not a decrease, by any standard you care to use.
But thanks for proving the point of my question, very good of you.
Larry - Some cool attempts at insults there dude, but given you start your statement with the claim of cooling since 1995 when even most deniers claim 1998 as the peak, you do realize 1998 is after 1995 don't you, and the fact that 2005 has surpassed 1998 and that 2010 tied with 2005, sadly I think it pretty obvious who has the learning disability.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.gif
Thie above shows 1995, it is well below 1998 and had an anomaly of ~0.38c, global averages are now over 0.6c that is an increase not a decrease, by any standard you care to use.
But thanks for proving the point of my question, very good of you.