...their Climate Change report? I believe that you should always be sceptical of AGW because The RS talk about huge ranges and many massive areas of uncertainty for example they say in paragraph 48 that some important processes are "very poorly understood" as below:
"Additional mechanisms that influence climate sensitivity have been identified, including the response of the carbon cycle to climate change, for example the loss of organic carbon currently stored in soils. The net effect of changes in the carbon cycle in all current models is to increase warming, by an amount that varies considerably from model to model because of uncertainties in how to represent the relevant processes. The future strength of the uptake of CO2 by the land and oceans (which together are currently responsible for taking up about half of the emissions from human activity – is very poorly understood, particularly because of gaps in our understanding of the response of biological processes to changes in both CO2 concentrations and climate"
http://royalsociety.org/News_WF.aspx?pageid=4294972969&terms=climate+change&fragment=&SearchType=&terms=climate%20change
So why do some theromphobes "religiously believe" in the science when the Royal Society so obviously do not?
This is the question original question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlFzTRW5UC2frvEegp2hT_H_5nNG;_ylv=3?qid=20110106152958AAc8tba
Thanks for the answer Eric but please note the question says "some religious thermophobes"
"Additional mechanisms that influence climate sensitivity have been identified, including the response of the carbon cycle to climate change, for example the loss of organic carbon currently stored in soils. The net effect of changes in the carbon cycle in all current models is to increase warming, by an amount that varies considerably from model to model because of uncertainties in how to represent the relevant processes. The future strength of the uptake of CO2 by the land and oceans (which together are currently responsible for taking up about half of the emissions from human activity – is very poorly understood, particularly because of gaps in our understanding of the response of biological processes to changes in both CO2 concentrations and climate"
http://royalsociety.org/News_WF.aspx?pageid=4294972969&terms=climate+change&fragment=&SearchType=&terms=climate%20change
So why do some theromphobes "religiously believe" in the science when the Royal Society so obviously do not?
This is the question original question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlFzTRW5UC2frvEegp2hT_H_5nNG;_ylv=3?qid=20110106152958AAc8tba
Thanks for the answer Eric but please note the question says "some religious thermophobes"