Consensus is not science. Not by a longshot. If "consensus" means truth, then that means that the Earth was once flat, that there were once four elements and four "humours," that the Sun moves around the Earth, etc., all of which were once the "consensus" viewpoint across the scientific community.
No, true science only needs a single proof, which global warming believers lack. Their claims for "consensus" only emphasize their lack of scientific evidence, because evidence would preclude the need for consensus.
No, true science only needs a single proof, which global warming believers lack. Their claims for "consensus" only emphasize their lack of scientific evidence, because evidence would preclude the need for consensus.