Before you say something stupid, listen to what I have to say.
It's pretty clear that business owners make far more transactions that anyone else. For example, Burger King sells thousands of cheeseburgers every day. Now, if we can also assume that every time a transaction is made consensually it benefits both parties (because if buying or selling something didn't benefit you, you wouldn't buy or sell it), then why can't we conclude that business owners deserve more money than anyone else because they benefit more people?
It's pretty clear that business owners make far more transactions that anyone else. For example, Burger King sells thousands of cheeseburgers every day. Now, if we can also assume that every time a transaction is made consensually it benefits both parties (because if buying or selling something didn't benefit you, you wouldn't buy or sell it), then why can't we conclude that business owners deserve more money than anyone else because they benefit more people?