Why do people keep arguing rose vs rondo but neither are the best? CP3 is the best?

Crawdaddycon

New member
CP3 is better then both, both of them have had really good years but have yet to be consistent over a period of more then 40 games. Look at roses numbers

Rose: 24 ppg 4.5 rpg 8 apg 3.5topg 45% shooting 38% 3pt - very decent for a top of the line hybrid - must be noted that the 45% shooting isn't great for a slashing/3pt pg who doesn't take many mid rangers (i've watched bulls games) he also doesn't have a great ast/to ratio and isn't the greatest dribbler
Rondo: 11 ppg 4.5 rpg 13.5apg 4topg 53% shooting (never shoots though) 30% 3pt shooter - must be noted hes an awful ft shooter and that is REQUIRED in a pg and he passes up easy shots when he should take them, he literally dribbles within 10 feet of the basket and nobody contests him until he gets to like 9 feet out, thats pathetic.

Now guys, before you start getting all mad the crunch time, statistically none of these guys are that much better then the other. In fact, it should be noted that neither are great in the crunch as most players are. Neither are established winners (rondo has a ring but didn't do much for it in 08) and rose is having a break out season. They are young but neither are the best currently.

CP3 - 16ppg 4 rpg 10apg 48% fg 45% 3 (makes at least 1 3 a game on average) - must be noted that he is a 90% ft shooter and has only 2.3 topg, much better at ball handling, and has 2.7 spg most in the league. (Has the highest ast/to ratio in the league?) Hes very good on defense, a perimeter defender, and to top it all off, his numbers are down from 2 seasons ago...

Deron is also good guys, but save it 4 another conversation
platinum fades, no cp3 doesn't shoot many jumpers either. Their pg's, they not suppose to shoot jumpers. However, I do not see derrick rose shooting midrange jumpers very often. How many hornet games have you watched? Have you ever considered that this is the first season where he has been "good" you can't say hes the best in the league because hes played good over 40 games, and even in comparison to paul hes still blundering. 45% isn't good friend, fg % determines how productive a player is offensively. FT's are too, it would be useful if the league showed how many ft's each player had and how many and ones they had as well, because 2 or 3 fts is a possession, it should be counted as an attempt...
 
Back
Top