Why do Liberals blame Bush for 9/11 but don't...?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ique
  • Start date Start date
I

Ique

Guest
Why do Liberals constantly blame Bush for 9/11, but never blame any of THESE on Bill Clinton?2/26/1993 - World Trade Center Bombing4/19/1995 - Oklahoma City Bombing6/25/1996 - Khobar Towers Bombing (building used to house members of the 4404th Provisional Wing of the United States Air Force)8/7/1998 - African Embassy Bombings (terrorists detonated twp bombs at two American Embassies [legally sovereign US soil] in Dar es Salaam and Nairobi)10/12/2000 - USS Cole BombingDouble standards?Oops...forgot one.11/13/1995 - Riyadh Bombing (attack against an American-run military training facility in Riyadh, capital of Saudi Arabia)logan: Terrorism is terrorism, no matter whether the terrorists are foreign or domestic.longhaired freaky liberal...er...person: How can you say the Khobar Towers bombing, African embassy bombings, USS Cole bombing, and (I assume) the Riyadh bombing aren't terrorism?teeewalk: If you're President and someone gives YOU a memo that says "Person A may attack us", but has no time, date, place, or method indicated...what would you do? Sit in the Oval Office until it happened?Alex S: Are you saying those bombings NEVER happened? Is that how my question is inaccurate?
 
Because Liberals have double standards and prefer to use the media to brainwash Americans into voting for a cult leader.
 
Yes, a double standard. Evidently it's worked for them thanks to the liberal media.
 
I guess for the same reason cons accused Clinton of "wagging the dog" when he went after the terrorists.And Clinton actually caught the guys responsible for those bombings.Bush didn't.
 
Hey man thats a great question, thats liberals for you. Im really weary about the future and what is to come for this country. Things will indeed change, but to say that the change will be ALL good is not true.
 
I don't blame him for 9-11 (even though he was warned about bin Laden, yet did nothing)
 
That's funny. I'm a liberal. I don't blame Bush for 9/11. I blame the hijackers and Al Qaida.
 
WTC bombing - 1 month after Clinton came into officeOklahoma City - right-wing American terroristKhobar towers - not terrorismAfrican Embassy bombing - not terrorismUSS cole bombing - not terrorismWhat would you want Clinton to do?edit: terrorism targets civilians, not political and military targets.
 
I agree completely Clinton is more to blame than Bush. If Clinton would have done something about these then there would have never been a 9/11. I have been trying to get this same thing through peoples heads for a while but nobody seems to have any common sense or understand logic anymore!
 
Clinton never had a security brief that said the we would be attacked on our own soil and then ignore it. Oklahoma was domestic terrorism. We didn't have anything in action to deter that kind of threat yet.
 
Clinton was never given a memo stating: "Person A plans to attack target B".Bush WAS given a memo that stated: "Osama Bin Laden planning to strike within the U.S." And then Bush chose to go on vacation.Does that sit right with you?
 
I'm a registered Republican who fully supports President Obama and hates, with every molecule of my existence, the entire Bush family from the youngest to the oldest. And I, like you, realize that every president between and including LBJ and GWB are guilty of war crimes and treason. Let's just hope that President Obama does not fall prey to the International Terrorist Organization known as The Federal Reserve like those mentioned above have.
 
ah, silly americansYou really need to learn what punctuation is, and how to use it. Your question as it stands is inaccurate, and frankly, moronic.Reminds me of your hero, I guess.
 
because they're looking at the most recent events.i feel so bad for Bush, he really wasn't a bad president.i think he did a great job. its not his fault we went to war.. it was inevitable. we've been having problems with Iraq for some time now, if i'm not mistaken. and if i am, please forgive my ignorance.i just KNOW that if Obama messes up the slightest bit that people will still blame everything on Bush.
 
There is no evidence that the Clinton administration was aware of the plans of either of the two domestic tragedies you've listed before they happened. The same cannot be said for the Bush administration and 9/11. Terrorist groups are to blame for all the instances you've listed... but in only one case were the warnings ignored by a presidential administration.
 
Liberals blame Bush if it rains in Oklahoma.It is clear that al Qaeda began planning the 9/11 attacks years in advance. They occurred eight months into the Bush Administration. I don't blame Clinton for 9/11. Many pundits say the attacks came off because the CIA and FBI were not communicating with each other. In some cases, it appears they weren't even talking to themselves.
 
Back
Top