H
Happy Bullet
Guest
http://www.physorg.com/news83863660.html
"Dr Macnamara found that, by volume, 69 per cent of mass media reporting and commentary on men was unfavourable, compared with just 12 per cent favourable and 19 per cent neutral or balanced.
Some of the recurring themes in media content portrayed men as violent, sexually abusive, unable to be trusted with children, 'deadbeat dads', commitment phobic and in need of 're-construction'.
"Men were predominantly reported or portrayed in mass media as villains, aggressors, perverts and philanderers, with more than 75 per cent of all mass media representations of men and male identity showing men in on one of these four ways," Dr Macnamara says."
Pretty hard to see how feminism is about equality when they ignore and contribute to a significant issue in relation to men, then whine when they are affected by that issue in the slightest.
Why do they do it?
Other sources saying the same thing (seeing as feminists on here seem to think an ad hominem attack on the site providing the data constitutes an acceptable sole argument):
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/media-the-real-villains/2006/12/08/1165081157695.html
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20866939-5007146,00.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1748682/posts
http://menshealth.uws.edu.au/documents/Mass%20media%20reps%20of%20males%20Ch6.pdf
We can see plenty of the negative portrayals of men come directly from the ideologues of feminism.
Why are feminists so blatantly biased on the issue if they are about equality?
Powered by Yahoo Answers
"Dr Macnamara found that, by volume, 69 per cent of mass media reporting and commentary on men was unfavourable, compared with just 12 per cent favourable and 19 per cent neutral or balanced.
Some of the recurring themes in media content portrayed men as violent, sexually abusive, unable to be trusted with children, 'deadbeat dads', commitment phobic and in need of 're-construction'.
"Men were predominantly reported or portrayed in mass media as villains, aggressors, perverts and philanderers, with more than 75 per cent of all mass media representations of men and male identity showing men in on one of these four ways," Dr Macnamara says."
Pretty hard to see how feminism is about equality when they ignore and contribute to a significant issue in relation to men, then whine when they are affected by that issue in the slightest.
Why do they do it?
Other sources saying the same thing (seeing as feminists on here seem to think an ad hominem attack on the site providing the data constitutes an acceptable sole argument):
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/media-the-real-villains/2006/12/08/1165081157695.html
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20866939-5007146,00.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1748682/posts
http://menshealth.uws.edu.au/documents/Mass%20media%20reps%20of%20males%20Ch6.pdf
We can see plenty of the negative portrayals of men come directly from the ideologues of feminism.
Why are feminists so blatantly biased on the issue if they are about equality?
Powered by Yahoo Answers