Why do Creations have such weak arguments that they think are strong arguments?

When did humans leave Africa again? How long did it take to transform into all the regional variants, and populate nearly every corner of the globe? And why in the last 10,000 years (1/6 of this transition time) has there been no changes in humans?

50,000 years and all that change?????!!!! and nothing in the last 10,000 years....???? Seems very odd.

Oh... and we have practically eliminated most of the environmental pressures that would restrict 'natural selection'...... We should be evolving like crazy.

***I'm the only one that provided evidence. To bad for evolutionists, they came up with it. And now that 'evolution' has been given the best opportunity to present itself... it hasn't.

***Thumbs down for not knowing how your own theory is suppose to work????!! lol classic. Let me say it again then. Natural selection restricts (weeds out) evolutionary changes that are not 'beneficial' due to environmental pressure. Without environmental pressure, all changes would be favored.
 
Atheists have no proof at all...No big bang...what it looked liked...if so I should be able to put a big bang im my son's dirty room let it go boom and it be clean and orderly....Creation is supported by science as well...everything that is detailed is only admired by humans...
 
Creationists, I presume, is what you mean.

Being wrong feels exactly like being right. (Important for everyone to remember, actually.) They can't tell the difference.
 
Creationist propagandists (those who promote creationism on a large level) are either intentionally deceitful or unwilling to admit when they are wrong (it is easier to try to prove yourself right then admit that you were wrong on a lot of things, especially if millions of supporters have donated their money to you). Creationist followers never really fact check the information creationist propagandists put out for two major reasons. One, they fear that accepting any alternative ideas would shake their belief in a God. The second, they never actually thought that creationism could be wrong and that evolution has really legitimacy. I will admit first hand that I never considered looking at the facts of evolution till I saw a strong argument presented for it on PBS by a Roman Catholic (Dr. Ken Miller). So, that may be another reason as well, the idea that Evolution and Christianity must be viewed in conflict when they really must not be in conflict.
 
We believe what we believe. Just because you don't agree doesn't mean you have to go out of your way to put us down.
 
Because they have weak minds that they think are strong minds.

It's a well-known fact of human nature that the dumbest and most inept people are the ones most susceptible to positive illusions of their own skills.
 
Back
Top