It gets a little embarrassing that after all this time, there are still people who constantly reuse the same arguments that keep being refuted. Fine-tuning argument, Pascal's wager, cosmological argument, teleological argument ... and then we get onto the whole host of degrading fallacies when those arguments have been exhausted (ad hominem, wishful thinking, proof-burden shifting, special pleading, etc.) It's just exasperating.
This video illustrates my point (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSLkQnCurgs). You don't have to watch it and by all means I don't expect you to watch it as it's 10 minutes long, but it's there if you want to get a better idea of what I'm talking about.
This video illustrates my point (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSLkQnCurgs). You don't have to watch it and by all means I don't expect you to watch it as it's 10 minutes long, but it's there if you want to get a better idea of what I'm talking about.