of business? And that if they have to spend anymore money on their employees they are toast? What about all the profits and high salaries skimmed off by the top, and all the companies that can afford to do more for their employees but don't?
I've noticed this premise is a common one Cons take to be true after many, many years of discussing politics with them.
Do Cons think it is possible for a small business to be so successful that the owners pocket a bucketload of cash and could afford to spend a little more of that on his or her employees?
I've noticed this premise is a common one Cons take to be true after many, many years of discussing politics with them.
Do Cons think it is possible for a small business to be so successful that the owners pocket a bucketload of cash and could afford to spend a little more of that on his or her employees?