Why discuss Bush? Isn't it OBVIOUS that nothing that happened two years ago

BarryMarx

New member
can have ANY influence today? Silly liberals. Always trying to say that George W. Bush was somehow responsible for the economic collapse that started back in 2007.

Don't they realize that on January 20, 2009, 0bama became responsible for every single economic problem, no matter when it started?

Nothing that happened two WHOLE years ago could possibly have any consequences on what is happening today. That's not how the economy works. When it comes to the economy, every day is a new day. Prices fluctuate, people get and lose jobs, and new policies are adopted EVERY SINGLE DAY. Therefore, the inevitable conclusion is that Bush has no responsibility whatsoever for any economic event taking place today.

However, Bill Clinton is COMPLETELY responsible for the mortgage meltdown, isn't he?
 
Back
Top