B Ba Gurk New member Apr 12, 2011 #1 It's average at most... cool cgi, avg plot, below avg performances...
S Stul New member Apr 16, 2011 #9 i give it a 5 or 6, the audience i was watching it with probably would give them 10s
F FCK.DA.WORlD New member Apr 17, 2011 #10 it had amazing action and was entertaining. just what going to the movies are about. i think people seem to forget to have fun at the movies..
it had amazing action and was entertaining. just what going to the movies are about. i think people seem to forget to have fun at the movies..
T TINKMINK New member Apr 18, 2011 #11 I went in thinking it would be horrible, but was pleasently supriesed. I think the stupid humor was what turned it in to a reasonable movie and not a terrible summer movie.
I went in thinking it would be horrible, but was pleasently supriesed. I think the stupid humor was what turned it in to a reasonable movie and not a terrible summer movie.
S sHi GuRl New member Apr 18, 2011 #12 It was thrilling to watch. Jurassic park is a similar example of such a film
M mrmichaeltheking New member Apr 20, 2011 #15 same here... i'd give a 7 maybe, is not a bad movie, is just not that great imo
D dreaming (: New member Apr 20, 2011 #16 Pretty much. It was good, not great. Pretty much the epitome of a movie dictated by focus groups. It's a 57% on Rotten tomatoes, so it's not like it's getting all glowing reviews http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/transformers_the_movie/
Pretty much. It was good, not great. Pretty much the epitome of a movie dictated by focus groups. It's a 57% on Rotten tomatoes, so it's not like it's getting all glowing reviews http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/transformers_the_movie/
B bebe911 New member Apr 21, 2011 #17 Jurassic Park was much more entertaining and wasn't 11ty billion hours long. Plus the plot made sense.
Jurassic Park was much more entertaining and wasn't 11ty billion hours long. Plus the plot made sense.