I was seeking information and last night I got a violation email notification in my email that said this but my question was this.
Deleted Question: How's the sidereal days increasing in length while decreasing in clock hours?
Violation Reason: Misuse of the question and answer format
I was not abusing the question and answer format. I put in enough details so people would know what I'm saying and now I don't have an archive of it to place it back like I did with my fredh question.
The email said Hello Max
You have posted content to Yahoo! Answers in violation of our Community Guidelines or Terms of Service. As a result, your content has been deleted and 10 points have been deducted from your points total. Community Guidelines help to keep Yahoo! Answers a safe and useful community, so we appreciate your consideration of its rules.
Deleted Question: How's the sidereal days increasing in length while decreasing in clock hours?
Violation Reason: Misuse of the question and answer format
In Yahoo! Answers you must phrase questions in question format, and your answer must attempt to answer the question. Questions or answers must be written in a comprehensible way, and must be written in the language specific to the Answers site to which it is uploaded. You may not post conversational content without an attempt to post a meaningful question or answer a question or otherwise misuse the question and answer format.
If you feel this content was removed in error, please read the Community Guidelines and make sure that this content: 1. respects the question-answer format and is not chatty or personal communication; 2. does not contain non-relevant links to external sites or other questions and does not promote your own blog or website; 3. is respectful to other people and does not offend other community members. If you still believe this content has been removed in error, please contact Customer Care and tell us why.
Regards,
Yahoo! Customer Care
My question details were I have not to prove anything yet. In 99998 BC, the sidereal day was 23.93447 hours and now it's 23.93446 hours. How are they getting longer? The average length of sidereal day on Starry Night is 23 hours 56 minutes and 4.090564998291567426130528205804652 seconds or 23.9344696013884143242850362578349457366… hours approximately.
Your stories don't seem to add up. The years are getting shorter. Every year with each orbit, the Earth pulls itself a little closer to the Sun. It's a fact. In 100,000 BC, the year was about 365.254814 days from 99,998 BC for the first 1,350 years, which would make me want to add a double leap year about every 2 centuries via adding a February 30 to the calendar. The average length of year in solar days for the whole program is 365.24224037234585308816051123474198 days per year which would make me want to drop 1 day from the calendar an average of every 128.87216301745851186588509720993663 years, that means every 128 to 129 years of no February 29 on average for all of Starry Night 6 calendars. The length of year on average in atomic days is really 365.24224137386628495914588775517385 and if the Earth hadn't slowed down since 99,998 BC, that's how many solar days would be in a year on average and there'd always be 1 more sidereal day than solar days in the year as Earth is a prograde planet meaning that it has a prograde motion of rotation. The average length of day would be 24 atomic hours instead of 24.0000001 for example approximately.
On Monday, November 8, 1543 AD the length of the sidereal day was less than the average length of the sidereal day. Then on Wednesday, November 10, 1543 AD the length of the sidereal day was more than the average length of the sidereal day. It had changed forward by a decisecond by Tuesday, November 9, 1543 AD from all the average sidereal days from its start time in the program and back a decisecond by Thursday, November 11, 1543 AD which wasn't quite Veteran's Day yet because the Vietnam War hadn't been fought yet. So therefore the length of sidereal day for November 8, 1543 had to be less than 86,164.090564998291567426130528205804652 seconds and the length of sidereal day for November 10, 1543 had to be more than 86,164.090564998291567426130528205804652 seconds. So do you think that inbetween those 3 days the Earth, sped up in rotation, kept a constant rate of rotation for 2 days, and then slowed down on the 3rd day again, and then sped up again on Friday, November 12, 1543? In comparison, the sidereal days are becoming less than 23.9344696013884143242850362578349457366… hours long. Notice because the real dates in 1543 were in the Julian Calendar, October 29, October 30, October 31, November 1 and 2, I knew that the calendar was 10 days off by 1500 so I did everyone a favor and corrected them by 10 days as 10 days would've been dropped anyway by the time I reached the year 1583 onto the 1600's on October 4
-15, 1582. So you mayn't need to correct me or anything. Do a comparison and November 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 aren't really on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday but are actually on Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and Monday in the Julian Calendar which it uses up until October 15, 1582 Julian Day 22,991,161 days approximately. "when forwarded by the same time," oh when I say "when forwarded by the same time," I mean forwarded by the same amount of time.
But how can that be if the days were faster in the past and the days will be slower in the future? Is it because that the years were slower in the past while the days were faster and the years will be faster in the future when the days will be slower? Is that why they're reverse like that? I'm puzzled and I want to know more. Friday, October 28, 1408 AD to Friday, November 12, 1543 AD was the midpoint, the time when the length of the sidereal day in my area precise to within 1 decisecond, was the same length as the avera
Deleted Question: How's the sidereal days increasing in length while decreasing in clock hours?
Violation Reason: Misuse of the question and answer format
I was not abusing the question and answer format. I put in enough details so people would know what I'm saying and now I don't have an archive of it to place it back like I did with my fredh question.
The email said Hello Max
You have posted content to Yahoo! Answers in violation of our Community Guidelines or Terms of Service. As a result, your content has been deleted and 10 points have been deducted from your points total. Community Guidelines help to keep Yahoo! Answers a safe and useful community, so we appreciate your consideration of its rules.
Deleted Question: How's the sidereal days increasing in length while decreasing in clock hours?
Violation Reason: Misuse of the question and answer format
In Yahoo! Answers you must phrase questions in question format, and your answer must attempt to answer the question. Questions or answers must be written in a comprehensible way, and must be written in the language specific to the Answers site to which it is uploaded. You may not post conversational content without an attempt to post a meaningful question or answer a question or otherwise misuse the question and answer format.
If you feel this content was removed in error, please read the Community Guidelines and make sure that this content: 1. respects the question-answer format and is not chatty or personal communication; 2. does not contain non-relevant links to external sites or other questions and does not promote your own blog or website; 3. is respectful to other people and does not offend other community members. If you still believe this content has been removed in error, please contact Customer Care and tell us why.
Regards,
Yahoo! Customer Care
My question details were I have not to prove anything yet. In 99998 BC, the sidereal day was 23.93447 hours and now it's 23.93446 hours. How are they getting longer? The average length of sidereal day on Starry Night is 23 hours 56 minutes and 4.090564998291567426130528205804652 seconds or 23.9344696013884143242850362578349457366… hours approximately.
Your stories don't seem to add up. The years are getting shorter. Every year with each orbit, the Earth pulls itself a little closer to the Sun. It's a fact. In 100,000 BC, the year was about 365.254814 days from 99,998 BC for the first 1,350 years, which would make me want to add a double leap year about every 2 centuries via adding a February 30 to the calendar. The average length of year in solar days for the whole program is 365.24224037234585308816051123474198 days per year which would make me want to drop 1 day from the calendar an average of every 128.87216301745851186588509720993663 years, that means every 128 to 129 years of no February 29 on average for all of Starry Night 6 calendars. The length of year on average in atomic days is really 365.24224137386628495914588775517385 and if the Earth hadn't slowed down since 99,998 BC, that's how many solar days would be in a year on average and there'd always be 1 more sidereal day than solar days in the year as Earth is a prograde planet meaning that it has a prograde motion of rotation. The average length of day would be 24 atomic hours instead of 24.0000001 for example approximately.
On Monday, November 8, 1543 AD the length of the sidereal day was less than the average length of the sidereal day. Then on Wednesday, November 10, 1543 AD the length of the sidereal day was more than the average length of the sidereal day. It had changed forward by a decisecond by Tuesday, November 9, 1543 AD from all the average sidereal days from its start time in the program and back a decisecond by Thursday, November 11, 1543 AD which wasn't quite Veteran's Day yet because the Vietnam War hadn't been fought yet. So therefore the length of sidereal day for November 8, 1543 had to be less than 86,164.090564998291567426130528205804652 seconds and the length of sidereal day for November 10, 1543 had to be more than 86,164.090564998291567426130528205804652 seconds. So do you think that inbetween those 3 days the Earth, sped up in rotation, kept a constant rate of rotation for 2 days, and then slowed down on the 3rd day again, and then sped up again on Friday, November 12, 1543? In comparison, the sidereal days are becoming less than 23.9344696013884143242850362578349457366… hours long. Notice because the real dates in 1543 were in the Julian Calendar, October 29, October 30, October 31, November 1 and 2, I knew that the calendar was 10 days off by 1500 so I did everyone a favor and corrected them by 10 days as 10 days would've been dropped anyway by the time I reached the year 1583 onto the 1600's on October 4
-15, 1582. So you mayn't need to correct me or anything. Do a comparison and November 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 aren't really on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday but are actually on Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and Monday in the Julian Calendar which it uses up until October 15, 1582 Julian Day 22,991,161 days approximately. "when forwarded by the same time," oh when I say "when forwarded by the same time," I mean forwarded by the same amount of time.
But how can that be if the days were faster in the past and the days will be slower in the future? Is it because that the years were slower in the past while the days were faster and the years will be faster in the future when the days will be slower? Is that why they're reverse like that? I'm puzzled and I want to know more. Friday, October 28, 1408 AD to Friday, November 12, 1543 AD was the midpoint, the time when the length of the sidereal day in my area precise to within 1 decisecond, was the same length as the avera