E
ero52
Guest
It is quite evident that health care is a free market failure, allowing those who cannot afford insurance to go without.
What is it about a state-run system that is so abhorrent? Surely when 50m of your own American citizens cannot get access to adequate health care there should be change. A state sponsored system would even save you money and allow universal access.
Arguments of a superior system are quite frankly laughable, infant mortality rates are much higher than that of Britain and France, a fundamental, integral aspect of health care.
It confuses me to why this is resisted? Is it some kind of Cold War fear of Big Government that still exists?
What is it about a state-run system that is so abhorrent? Surely when 50m of your own American citizens cannot get access to adequate health care there should be change. A state sponsored system would even save you money and allow universal access.
Arguments of a superior system are quite frankly laughable, infant mortality rates are much higher than that of Britain and France, a fundamental, integral aspect of health care.
It confuses me to why this is resisted? Is it some kind of Cold War fear of Big Government that still exists?