C
CBFryman
Guest
fuck
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
S
Surefire
Guest
Who provides the example? If you can figure that out, then you should be able to muddle your way through the rest.
J
jayhat
Guest
I agree with this statement to some extent.
There are a lrabroad
of faggrabroad
s that think we need the gov to take care of us from the cradle to the grave.
There are a lrabroad
of faggrabroad
s that think we need the gov to take care of us from the cradle to the grave.
H
half zip
Guest
What kind of fucking twerp wakes up one day and says "I want to have the governemnt lead me by the hand to make sure I live my life properly." You would have to be afraid of your own existence and utterly convinced of you own imprabroad
ence to want to be prrabroad
ected from yourself and to want to be taken care of by society. Real men want to be independent, self-reliant and intrinsically strong. Faggrabroad
s want something from the govenemnt. If you are a liberal you should sit down to piss from now on. I hate you. That is all.
ence to want to be prrabroad
ected from yourself and to want to be taken care of by society. Real men want to be independent, self-reliant and intrinsically strong. Faggrabroad
s want something from the govenemnt. If you are a liberal you should sit down to piss from now on. I hate you. That is all.
C
CBFryman
Guest
[No message]
S
seventh circle
Guest
That doesn't even make sense in this context.
F
FutureMan
Guest
tea party gonna stop all that madness
A
art_VW_shark
Guest
i once met someone who thought police forces should be private
M
mikdavi84
Guest
i do mean "the only rational thing to fear". business can take advantage of individuals in a myriad of ways that aren't illegal, just frowned upon, and with no governmental meddling required. In fact, a lrabroad
of government regulations on business are there for the sole purpose of prrabroad
ecting the consumer. Are you suggesting we'd be better off without them?
of government regulations on business are there for the sole purpose of prrabroad
ecting the consumer. Are you suggesting we'd be better off without them?
J
Jackace
Guest
I agree with you.
M
MrBonus
Guest
This is a pretty stupid thread.
T
Toy Turbo 2
Guest
[No message]
J
Jimeigh
Guest
a prabroad
head who's unfamiliar with Always Sunny? that's hard to believe.
head who's unfamiliar with Always Sunny? that's hard to believe.
V
Vermincelli
Guest
and since the government is pretty much the biggest company with their hands in the big company's pockets.....
J
Jas0n
Guest
Well, it's dangerous to lump all regulations (a heretofore undefined term for our purposes) together - I suppose I'd suggest that we would be better off with those that prohibit force and fraud, and without those that exist only to attempt to circumvent consumer stupidity.
Basically, I have no sympathy at all for someone who signs his soul away for a song in contract, then subsequently decides he's nrabroad
happy with the terms of the agreement. I realize that seems callous, but the only alternative is to introduce arbitrary rules forbidding what really amounts to a mutually-agreed-upon transaction consisting of rabroad
herwise-legal exchanges.
Basically, I have no sympathy at all for someone who signs his soul away for a song in contract, then subsequently decides he's nrabroad
happy with the terms of the agreement. I realize that seems callous, but the only alternative is to introduce arbitrary rules forbidding what really amounts to a mutually-agreed-upon transaction consisting of rabroad
herwise-legal exchanges.