Who won this argument?

anonymous

New member
Please be objective and unbiased. Who do YOU think won the following argument? (All names and references have been changed to protect each individuals' identities).

Rob: my body hurts :(

Chris: there there brave soldier

Rob: Bro, it's everything...

Anonymous: Oh boo hoo you. Get over it. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger... most of the time.

Chris: going into a catabolic state does not kill you, and it def doesn't make you stronger

Anonymous: Woah there, johnny rain-cloud! Lighten up. I was kidding... and strength is relative as well as subjective, so... yes it does.

Matt: What if you became a quadraplegic? And suffered from depression?

Chris: i was offering an example of your most of the time. and yeah matt, that doesnt sound like it comes with too many pluses

Rob: What if the quadriplegic then shoots himself but doesn't die and becomes a vegetable the rest of his life?

Chris: he is in no way stronger

Rob: HI5 Chris.

Good team work, Honey. I feel like a mythbuster

Chris: HI5 rob. man, we should have our own show our something!

Rob: and people should pay me a lot for being so entertaining

Chris: i like the way you think

Anonymous: The term "Vegetable" means that the person no longer has any brain activity and is being kept alive via machines. According to the Medical Encyclopedia International, this classifies the person as "dead". Therefore, he was not made stronger, but was killed... by himself, I might add, which means that he was not able to gain any mental strength from the entire quadriplegic experience, which means that it killed him. He was not made stronger, but was killed by the process. Thank you all for confirming my above comment.

Rob: That's a really obscure definition of death and you're making a hefty assumption that this work out did not "kill me" and render me mentally and physically useless.

Anonymous: And yet, you are still able to move your fingers enough to type out messages that you obviously thought up... give it up, you can't win.

Rob: you don't know if, i am typing this or not. Plus, typing take little to no energy Stephen Hawking can still type despite his horrid state

Rob: lol sorry about the random comma i can barely type because of the sad state i'm in

Chris: since i was there for the workout and was with rob after, i will attest that he was physically and mentally decrepit afterwards

Chris: therefore he was not made stronger

Rob: lol no response from Anonymous. I guess we win

Chris: this calls for HI6

Rob: BRO WE DOIN' THIS! WE'RE MAKING THIS HAPPEN

Chris: HI6 FTW!!!!!!!

Anonymous: Wow, that works, since your opinion means so much to me...

And, Rob; the definition of death is not obscure. No brain activity and no means for any internal or external organs to function without the means of consistent invasive assistance from non-standard medical equipment. This includes the inability to draw oxygen out of the air and into the blood, also the inability to replenish mitochondria energy reserves independently, as well as the inability to prevent the body from decomposing without the assistance of said medical technology.

I said it before, you can't win.

Chris: just did. but you put up a good fight Anonymous. had i a hat on, i would tip it to you, but i am without a hat. although i have this protein smoothie in my hand, i shall toast to your efforts

Chris: cheers

Rob: BRO, I DON'T CARE WHO YOU ARE YOU DON'T INTERRUPT A HI6. IT'S ON.

First of all, you said "I might add, which means that he was not able to gain any mental strength from the entire quadriplegic experience, which means that it killed him. He ...was not made stronger, but was killed by the process. " so even though he had brain function he was still dead. That is my current state.

Chris: HI6 BRO!

Anonymous: ?... Rob? Did you ever learn proper grammar? If you start attack my actual sentences (mistakenly), rather than my ideas, then you may as well admit that you lost the ability to continue the argument. You should try to deal with the actual issue, or just admit defeat.

Rob: you didn't even argue against anything relevant that i just said about the topic. I was correcting my own grammar too, you wankerrrr
Anonymous: If you still can't comprehend what I was saying:

He wasn't dead when he shot himself, he was in the process of dying. The saying is: "What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger... most of the time". He was unable to become mentally stronger through the entire ordeal. Therefore, his mental strength failed him and he died from lack thereof, because he was not mentally strong enough to persevere through his circumstances.

He died when he became a vegetable. He became a vegetable when he wasn't strong enough to stop himself from shooting himself. He shot himself because he wasn't mentally strong enough to deal with the fact that he no longer had any limbs.

However, I will point out that he must have been quite intelligent for figuring out a way to shoot himself without any limbs.

Rob: He had a friend do it.

And you have no way of knowing whether or not i am in this state of "dying" that you talked about. And if am then i am in no way made stronger by it (in fact, it is actua
-actually killing me and will ultimately lead to my en...d). Therefore it did not make me stronger

Anonymous: He had a "friend" do it? Heh, some "friend"...

And, as I stated above, you are obviously capable of stringing together a series of rational (if misguided) thoughts and physically able to input them into your computer via some for of keyboard... or keypad (Are you on your laptop?)

Also, Stephen Hawking can't move any part of his body any more. He developed for himself a system which tracks his eye movements. That is how he communicates and operates. Also, in case you are wondering, Stephen Hawking is admirable and to be commended for not being as big a pussy as you right now. He dealt with his situation by looking ahead and developing this technology so that he could continue to push forward and live on. You just seem like you're ready to roll over and die.

Anonymous: And just so there's no miscommunication, I was kidding.

Rob: Lol well even if i'm ready to roll over and die that still proves my point that it didn't make me stronger.

Anonymous: I never said it did. All I said was that it could...

Rob: You insinuated that i had no right to complain because it didn't kill me so it will make me stronger. However, i argued that it has indeed not made me stronger.

Anonymous: You assumed that's what I was arguing. All I did was throw a comment out there and then Christopher decided to make an issue of it. So I defended my beliefs in the matter. I never said you had no right to complain. You can complain if you want to. All I did was use the very example you tried to use, and pointed out an alternative route you could take, if you so desired.

Rob: Pfffsssshh, sure.
 
Back
Top