i feel that way because 9/11 was inside job. Its a theory i have been sticking with for the past several years. I always had problem believing the word of Bush at face value. Everything he or his government said, i took it with a grin of salt.
So I'm just not going to believe the Bush government version of what was behind 9/11 attacks. Because he could not prove WMD existence in iraq too!
So now is a very good chance for the prosecutors to present solid evidence to civilian court against the 9/11 suspects. I have a feeling the evidence is negligible or no evidence at all except for media rhetoric like it was for WMD in iraq.
And thats why i feel 9/11 suspects will be acquited in the absence of true evidence. This is also backed by the fact that Bush was even afraid of trying them in military tribunal. He may have felt since there is no evidence whatsoever except for political and media rhetoric to coverup inside job, he would not let even military tribunal take place.
also there is no need to attack my intelligence or IQ. I have bachelor of science in mathematics.
and way too many websites and books specifically mention that Bush and Bin Laden were business partners for a long time
it is just like professional wrestling... fake! every part of the story is scripted
give me just one reason why I should not doubt the Bush version of 9/11 story? Why exactly must I take his word at face value? The true evidence was never made public. Now is the only chance there is for the evidence to be shown to court
if in case they do get acquited it would suggest an even stronger link of 9/11 being an inside job.
booboo: just because a confession is made by the use of waterboarding doesn't mean its real. There are numerous cases in US jails where inmates were released through DNA evidence after they pled guilty. Guilty plea can be made using torture too
ofcourse bin laden would claim responsibility so that inside job is covered up. this was all part of the plan. And thats exactly the reason why Rumsfeld let him off in 2001 even though he was within being captured. That is exactly why he will be never found too.
Also look at how uneasy Cheney and repubs are getting over the trial of 9/11 suspects. What for? If civilian court has death penalty, there is no reason for being uncomfortable. it clearly shows something is fishy
harold campin: you are just one of those who has blind faith in government and believes word per word that is told by government. While that maybe patriotic, it is certainly not sensible.
So I'm just not going to believe the Bush government version of what was behind 9/11 attacks. Because he could not prove WMD existence in iraq too!
So now is a very good chance for the prosecutors to present solid evidence to civilian court against the 9/11 suspects. I have a feeling the evidence is negligible or no evidence at all except for media rhetoric like it was for WMD in iraq.
And thats why i feel 9/11 suspects will be acquited in the absence of true evidence. This is also backed by the fact that Bush was even afraid of trying them in military tribunal. He may have felt since there is no evidence whatsoever except for political and media rhetoric to coverup inside job, he would not let even military tribunal take place.
also there is no need to attack my intelligence or IQ. I have bachelor of science in mathematics.
and way too many websites and books specifically mention that Bush and Bin Laden were business partners for a long time
it is just like professional wrestling... fake! every part of the story is scripted
give me just one reason why I should not doubt the Bush version of 9/11 story? Why exactly must I take his word at face value? The true evidence was never made public. Now is the only chance there is for the evidence to be shown to court
if in case they do get acquited it would suggest an even stronger link of 9/11 being an inside job.
booboo: just because a confession is made by the use of waterboarding doesn't mean its real. There are numerous cases in US jails where inmates were released through DNA evidence after they pled guilty. Guilty plea can be made using torture too
ofcourse bin laden would claim responsibility so that inside job is covered up. this was all part of the plan. And thats exactly the reason why Rumsfeld let him off in 2001 even though he was within being captured. That is exactly why he will be never found too.
Also look at how uneasy Cheney and repubs are getting over the trial of 9/11 suspects. What for? If civilian court has death penalty, there is no reason for being uncomfortable. it clearly shows something is fishy
harold campin: you are just one of those who has blind faith in government and believes word per word that is told by government. While that maybe patriotic, it is certainly not sensible.