Omnicracy:
The idea that the right is inherantly wrong and violent strikes me as an incredibly closed minded one. If you continualy view your opponent as intelectualy lacking, how could you take there arguments seriousely? If you can take none of there arguments seriously, how can you judge who is the wise man and who is the fool in the end?
UAWC:
Sibirsky is probably the only person on the political right I've heard that makes any sense at all.
I'll take their arguments seriously when they start making sense and not appearing to be inherently selfish and lacking compassion for others.
Garrisona:
thats a dumb plan.
OK, Ill do the same. When you live in a free society you are not allowed to make statements like this. "Everyone in that group is stupid". Could you ever prove then that left is not selfish, or lacking of compassion or makes sense?
UAWC:
:lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:
The whole basis of the political left is sharing and making peace and understanding with your fellow man!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
ASE:
Is that is why conservatives in the US donate more time and money to charity than the left? :blink:
UAWC:
They give comparatively small amounts of charity out of their massive piles of wealth as an excuse. "Foreign aid?" Bull. It's obviously not working, as the people are still as poor as they always were.
"Foreign aid" and "charity" are almost always given by government to further a political agenda.
ASE:
You do realize that
A. In the US Conservatives tend to earn a little less, but donate 30% more to charity.
B. The US gives away more money in foreign aid than any other country
C. The government gives away massive amounts of money to help students pay for college. (the main reason people fail in the US is because they are lazy)
anyway, if anyone is wondering here are my sources
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl ... l_giv.html
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2682730&page=1
http://www.mixx.com/stories/3176302/the ... n_liberals
http://legacy.signonsandiego.com/uniont ... 7will.html
UAWC:
I still don't see the results of this. Only the claims.
ASE:
I am not claiming that what we are doing is successful, but what I hate it the Liberal idea that because they support the government supporting the poor somehow makes them better, and more charitable than Conservatives, when in reality Conservatives donate more.
So how is "the whole basis of the political left is sharing and making peace and understanding with your fellow man" when the left doesn't share with their fellow man as much as "greedy" Conservatives?
The idea that the right is inherantly wrong and violent strikes me as an incredibly closed minded one. If you continualy view your opponent as intelectualy lacking, how could you take there arguments seriousely? If you can take none of there arguments seriously, how can you judge who is the wise man and who is the fool in the end?
UAWC:
Sibirsky is probably the only person on the political right I've heard that makes any sense at all.
I'll take their arguments seriously when they start making sense and not appearing to be inherently selfish and lacking compassion for others.
Garrisona:
thats a dumb plan.
OK, Ill do the same. When you live in a free society you are not allowed to make statements like this. "Everyone in that group is stupid". Could you ever prove then that left is not selfish, or lacking of compassion or makes sense?
UAWC:
:lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:
The whole basis of the political left is sharing and making peace and understanding with your fellow man!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
ASE:
Is that is why conservatives in the US donate more time and money to charity than the left? :blink:
UAWC:
They give comparatively small amounts of charity out of their massive piles of wealth as an excuse. "Foreign aid?" Bull. It's obviously not working, as the people are still as poor as they always were.
"Foreign aid" and "charity" are almost always given by government to further a political agenda.
ASE:
You do realize that
A. In the US Conservatives tend to earn a little less, but donate 30% more to charity.
B. The US gives away more money in foreign aid than any other country
C. The government gives away massive amounts of money to help students pay for college. (the main reason people fail in the US is because they are lazy)
anyway, if anyone is wondering here are my sources
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl ... l_giv.html
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2682730&page=1
http://www.mixx.com/stories/3176302/the ... n_liberals
http://legacy.signonsandiego.com/uniont ... 7will.html
UAWC:
I still don't see the results of this. Only the claims.
ASE:
I am not claiming that what we are doing is successful, but what I hate it the Liberal idea that because they support the government supporting the poor somehow makes them better, and more charitable than Conservatives, when in reality Conservatives donate more.
So how is "the whole basis of the political left is sharing and making peace and understanding with your fellow man" when the left doesn't share with their fellow man as much as "greedy" Conservatives?