Who do you find more credible in discussing the origins of life.?

L

livingthelife

New member
A group of esteemed scientists who have broke the human genome, understand RNA, DNA, astronomy, galactic events, geology, tectronic movements of the earths crust etc etc.

OR

some pastor who makes his living from a church baseing their lives on some bronze age teaching and taking direct, again direct guidance from his imaginary friend who speaks to him in his mind, no one else can hear him by the way?
Some answers are nuts,

someone said the pastor has been proved right? It has been proved there is no, God and the bible is false.

People just dont accept it because they are blinded to the truth.
 
that is the best question ive read here in a long time! seriously! its not a stupid where do we go but a question that can be answered logically! try out our forum. i think that question could be answered well by both sides there, pastors and scientists use it, {not kids like here} you have nothing to loose by just looking!
 
The way you're phrasing it, you're automatically disqualifying the latter. So of course I'd pick the former.

But if you were actually being intellectually honest, and worded them in a way that would make the playing field less biased, I would say "Neither." For the idea that we can possibly know how life began on the planet, or really how *anything* happened literally billions of years ago with any kind of certainty is laughable to me.
 
Back
Top