Which do you think makes a better poet, if either?

One that can sit once inspired, scribbled a poem onto a napkin in McDonalds in 2 minutes, and then only make minute changes to it..

Or one that sits and thinks about the writing, and takes their time, revising it a few times before it says what they want it to?

what is your opinion on which takes more talent, and which generally generates better work?
 
Back
Top