when bush is put out of office will that be the end of his self made war on terror?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dino
  • Start date Start date
You must not understand what has really happened. It can't be his war, he is only one part of the government hierarchy, you have a senate and congress to have to contend with. What has happened is necessary, remember where the twin towers used to be?Bush didn't blow them up/And part of the war on terror is international so the UN is involved.This is the first enemy that can't be faced on a battlefield, so it is a little more complex. I am glad he took action, the troops are glad to do their job, I wish I could serve again.
 
No, it's not again. It doesn't matter who is elected - both of their foreign policies reflect fighting the Iraq war (or moving most or all troops to Afghanistan according to Obama). The War on Terror will reign on until there is no terror left - which won't happen.
 
I read your question as far as "his self made war" - which can only mean that you believe this administration knocked the towers down - bombed the Marine barracks - bombed the USS Cole - bombed the countless embassies - hijacked numerous planes - etc.....and that's simply ridiculous.
 
I think Obama/Brzezinski will be worse than McCain as far as keeping the phony war on terrorism going. But it's mostly the Zionist globalist controllers doing the terrorism BS and Bush is just a sock puppet, as will Obama and McCain be. They make a lot of money from US worker's tax dollars and the military industrial complex needed a new enemy since the cold war had ended.
 
Well - no - not if Macain gets in. becasue he is as committed to Iraq as Bush. I think his comment "hundred years" was probably an error - but nevertheless he will continue the foreign occupation.
 
Counter-terrorism will continue, because it is still a major foreign policy issue.

But the phrase "War on Terror" might fade away because, frankly, it sounds stupid and childish, just like the "Axis of Evil".
 
Back
Top