companies couldn't fire people for Speech? Obviously, that would mean people could freely criticize their employers (both orally and in written/Internet postings form) without fear.
But what sort of negative situations could you imagine if the Court upheld such an expansive view of Free Speech and 1st Amendment RIghts?
But what sort of negative situations could you imagine if the Court upheld such an expansive view of Free Speech and 1st Amendment RIghts?