Shadow Knight
New member
The nominee can choose not to answer questions.
The committee members often give long winded speeches then either serve up softball questions or go into attack mode, depending on whose party the president belongs too.
Nothing of substance is learned about the nominee other than what already can be discerned from their record.
Can there be any changes made that would actually lead to something substantive coming our of these hearings?
The committee members often give long winded speeches then either serve up softball questions or go into attack mode, depending on whose party the president belongs too.
Nothing of substance is learned about the nominee other than what already can be discerned from their record.
Can there be any changes made that would actually lead to something substantive coming our of these hearings?