What is more deceiving in the wrestling business (or wrestling company)

from one fan spreading to another? I was thinking about some specific details that fans usually talk about that sometimes come illogical to me. I thought I would ask this question to determine which certain aspect is the most deceiving among others.

Here are a couple of options you can consider:
1. The amount of moves a wrestler has in their move set determines whether they're a good wrestler or not.

2. The amount of time a wrestler stays in a certain division, the total championships held or whether a wrestler gets a push or not determines whether a wrestler is overrated or underrated.

3. Other or All of the above.

Please share your thoughts with details on what specific part of the wrestling business (or a wrestling company) is the most deceiving by fans. Thanks in advanced.
 
If the Smarks hate a certain wrestler than everybody who listens to them hates that wrestler.

It is dumb.The less knowledgeable fans listen to these people and hang on there every word.people need to get there own opinions on things and not agreeing with other people all the time.

people only hate John Cena because the Smarks hate him.They hate the fact that he applies to kids.They come up with reasons to hate him and people join in with them.Now some people do hate cena for there own reasons,that is fine.

Hulk Hogan applied to kids and he only had 5 moves and people love him but they hate Cena.You can't tell me they don't just hop on the bandwagon when people shit on a wrestler.
 
3. Other or All of the above
i think all of the above because everything is important to consider who's a good wrestler but that isn't always true some wrestler get recognize for all the wrong reasons. e.g looks (kelly kelly) smack talking (john cena) ect....
 
Back
Top