What does the media have to gain from only reporting on the negative side of...

  • Thread starter Thread starter smellyfoot™
  • Start date Start date
S

smellyfoot™

Guest
...global warming? There is a global warming conference going on in NYC this week. But the 100+ scientists are ones who disagree with the commonly accepted "we caused it , we can fix it" kind of thinking about the climate. Why do we never get to hear from the other side of the issue in the mainstream media? What do they have to gain by scaring everyone with the threat of global warming?
 
There simply aren't any respectable scientists, writing in peer reviewed journals, that don't accept climate change is happening. So, nothing to report.
 
The media serves as scaremongers under the disguise of being informative. Notice that everything reported in the news is spun in a way that could mean the end of humanity.

Look at that spy satellite that stopped functioning. The news spun that story in a way that created panic in many people.

It's just the nature of the media.
 
I would like an objective view on global warming. There is something to global warning in my opinion. America needs to break it's dependency on foreign oil. If cheaper, cleaner alternatives can be used I am all for it. Going green could be the America's new industry, the start of an economic boom.
 
Back
Top