what do you think about my argument that "bullying" doesn't exist?

"bullying" is simply one of many possible labels for a behaviour, and it is filled with connotations of being morally wrong. Those negative connotations basically make "bullying" defined as "low value habitual cruetly", instead of just "value neutral habitual cruelty". Since statements of worth can't be true or not true (because they are subjective), saying it is TRUE that "low value habitual cruelty" exists is inaccurate.
adair: i took philosophy a few years ago
barbie: i am not someone who would be called a "bully", but I went through an experience that many would consider being "bullied" in elementary school, and I don't want to think of myself as a "bullying" victim.
 
Back
Top