swordbuster
New member
Life:
• All individuals are born free with free will and power innate, but we are separated from this freedom when we are born into the civilised world and can do nothing about it. Therefore we should all be recognised as free people and society should work towards returning humanity to real freedom and working to the point where all humans can free up their lives to the point where humans can finally live truly free lives.
• All individuals have a solid natural right to their opinions. I myself would never apologize for expressing my beliefs.
• Sometimes the things we do can affect our wider world, for better or for worse depending said actions.
• If happiness is a goal in life, shouldn’t the fulfilling of our desires by another goal? In my view, yes. Fulfilling of desires and pleasures shouldn’t be a problem because everyone has a right to them and everyone has the right to love.
• Everyone has the right to free love and to love and show love however they want. Marriage should remain non-compulsory and there should be no norms or standards for how you show your love. The romantic affairs of people should not be so hyped by people nor should it be any concern of the state, the general public or the media. There should be no restrictions on who you love or have relationships with. Society should be ashamed of itself for applying moral pressure on people for their romantic or sexual conduct.
• Marriage is simply an institution for social planning and the planning of lives. You don’t have to marry to love and have a family. Why should love be recognised legally? Why should people be forced into monogamous pairs? To join two free individuals into a single heading destroys the freedom and foundation of each individual. There can be love outside marriage and society should not be obliged to condemn that. No marriage does not mean no love.
• Freedom is not a privilege, it is an absolute right. Free will is not awarded or given to you, it is an innate gift and power that we are born with, and it should be universally recognised as such. Without it, we are not just equivalent to robots, but also slaves to each other and, ultimately, ourselves if you consider the brain as the grand controller.
• Humans have fallen from their true selves. Lordship, social dominance, conformity, fear, subservience, shame, guilt, despair, division, work: those words describe how humanity was not supposed to live and the humanity now living with this is what humanity was not supposed to become.
• Everyone has the right to defend themselves when they are harmed. Even taking the law to your own hands to pursue and exact justice is a natural right.
• What’s so mandatorily special about specifically human life when all life should be treated equal and taken seriously. Humans are not the centre of anything; they never have been and never will.
• It is acknowledged fact that humans still haven’t found the meaning of life. I think that the reason why we haven’t found a purpose for life is because maybe life has no purpose and we don’t have a reason to be here as everything happened without reason. This may sound bad but isn’t, because if there was a purpose to life, we would naturally be forced to follow it. Why do we need purpose? Why do we need meaning? Life is out there to be lived.
• Legal rights are meaningless and hollow as they are purely statutory and government sanctioned. Natural rights are self-evident and they mean everything as they are not sanctioned, they are eternal and inalienable.
• They only way to find any truth is through freedom, particularly freedom of speech, expression and action. In this case speech is the representation of truth, expression is the displaying of truth, and action is the seeking of truth. There is no static or empirical knowledge.
• Nothing is infallible and no one is infallible.
• What’s the point of moral obligation? Why do good things solely because you’re told to or are obliged to? It’s not a good deed without good will; good, independent will, just as ill deeds are only ill deeds with ill will.
• Citizenship is just classification, legal status and a mark, nothing more. It recognises people as members of a society who have common duties, not as people.
• Life is not a cosmic conflict of good and evil.
• The society we have now needs to see progress that will benefit it greatly while ignoring all boundaries.
• The society we have now is flawed because of the ignorance of freedom, equality, natural rights and justice, and those four things must be restored to redeem society.
• Death is not something to be feared. There is no heaven, no hell, no afterlife, so we might as well make the most of our earthly lives without fear of any “afterlife consequences”. Some may find this strange, but if we didn’t have funerals and we just buried them in the ground, the dead would be reunited with the earth.
What alignment represent these views? (LG, NG, CG, LN, TN, CN, LE, NE or CE?)
Additional views:
• I believe in balance. There is a balance of nature that nature regulates by itself, and if it has trouble regulating itself, we should help the earth's balance. Without this balance, there is no life. You could call it Gaia if you so choose.
• I believe in a metaphysical balance, because if the universe is not in constant, self-regulating metaphysical balance, virtually nothing would exist.
• If you think about a balance between good and evil, that only exists in society. There are most likely two evils, and good is the balancing agent. If the balance can be broken in favor of good, it would be more like breaking it in favor of authority, you'd create another evil out of good.
• In society, rebellion against the establishment can be a good way of turning society to balance.
• The societal balance is the centre of authority and madness. Authority is repression, madness is fear and paranoia, and balance is the self-regulating natural state, with freedom, equality, nat
Ignore the "nat". It should say "natural rights". The sentence is also supposed to continue after that to say "natural rights and justiced preserved".
@edetwi Did you take into account the things I said about balance (see additional details)?
• All individuals are born free with free will and power innate, but we are separated from this freedom when we are born into the civilised world and can do nothing about it. Therefore we should all be recognised as free people and society should work towards returning humanity to real freedom and working to the point where all humans can free up their lives to the point where humans can finally live truly free lives.
• All individuals have a solid natural right to their opinions. I myself would never apologize for expressing my beliefs.
• Sometimes the things we do can affect our wider world, for better or for worse depending said actions.
• If happiness is a goal in life, shouldn’t the fulfilling of our desires by another goal? In my view, yes. Fulfilling of desires and pleasures shouldn’t be a problem because everyone has a right to them and everyone has the right to love.
• Everyone has the right to free love and to love and show love however they want. Marriage should remain non-compulsory and there should be no norms or standards for how you show your love. The romantic affairs of people should not be so hyped by people nor should it be any concern of the state, the general public or the media. There should be no restrictions on who you love or have relationships with. Society should be ashamed of itself for applying moral pressure on people for their romantic or sexual conduct.
• Marriage is simply an institution for social planning and the planning of lives. You don’t have to marry to love and have a family. Why should love be recognised legally? Why should people be forced into monogamous pairs? To join two free individuals into a single heading destroys the freedom and foundation of each individual. There can be love outside marriage and society should not be obliged to condemn that. No marriage does not mean no love.
• Freedom is not a privilege, it is an absolute right. Free will is not awarded or given to you, it is an innate gift and power that we are born with, and it should be universally recognised as such. Without it, we are not just equivalent to robots, but also slaves to each other and, ultimately, ourselves if you consider the brain as the grand controller.
• Humans have fallen from their true selves. Lordship, social dominance, conformity, fear, subservience, shame, guilt, despair, division, work: those words describe how humanity was not supposed to live and the humanity now living with this is what humanity was not supposed to become.
• Everyone has the right to defend themselves when they are harmed. Even taking the law to your own hands to pursue and exact justice is a natural right.
• What’s so mandatorily special about specifically human life when all life should be treated equal and taken seriously. Humans are not the centre of anything; they never have been and never will.
• It is acknowledged fact that humans still haven’t found the meaning of life. I think that the reason why we haven’t found a purpose for life is because maybe life has no purpose and we don’t have a reason to be here as everything happened without reason. This may sound bad but isn’t, because if there was a purpose to life, we would naturally be forced to follow it. Why do we need purpose? Why do we need meaning? Life is out there to be lived.
• Legal rights are meaningless and hollow as they are purely statutory and government sanctioned. Natural rights are self-evident and they mean everything as they are not sanctioned, they are eternal and inalienable.
• They only way to find any truth is through freedom, particularly freedom of speech, expression and action. In this case speech is the representation of truth, expression is the displaying of truth, and action is the seeking of truth. There is no static or empirical knowledge.
• Nothing is infallible and no one is infallible.
• What’s the point of moral obligation? Why do good things solely because you’re told to or are obliged to? It’s not a good deed without good will; good, independent will, just as ill deeds are only ill deeds with ill will.
• Citizenship is just classification, legal status and a mark, nothing more. It recognises people as members of a society who have common duties, not as people.
• Life is not a cosmic conflict of good and evil.
• The society we have now needs to see progress that will benefit it greatly while ignoring all boundaries.
• The society we have now is flawed because of the ignorance of freedom, equality, natural rights and justice, and those four things must be restored to redeem society.
• Death is not something to be feared. There is no heaven, no hell, no afterlife, so we might as well make the most of our earthly lives without fear of any “afterlife consequences”. Some may find this strange, but if we didn’t have funerals and we just buried them in the ground, the dead would be reunited with the earth.
What alignment represent these views? (LG, NG, CG, LN, TN, CN, LE, NE or CE?)
Additional views:
• I believe in balance. There is a balance of nature that nature regulates by itself, and if it has trouble regulating itself, we should help the earth's balance. Without this balance, there is no life. You could call it Gaia if you so choose.
• I believe in a metaphysical balance, because if the universe is not in constant, self-regulating metaphysical balance, virtually nothing would exist.
• If you think about a balance between good and evil, that only exists in society. There are most likely two evils, and good is the balancing agent. If the balance can be broken in favor of good, it would be more like breaking it in favor of authority, you'd create another evil out of good.
• In society, rebellion against the establishment can be a good way of turning society to balance.
• The societal balance is the centre of authority and madness. Authority is repression, madness is fear and paranoia, and balance is the self-regulating natural state, with freedom, equality, nat
Ignore the "nat". It should say "natural rights". The sentence is also supposed to continue after that to say "natural rights and justiced preserved".
@edetwi Did you take into account the things I said about balance (see additional details)?