A
AAR fan
Guest
some people have whole scientific theories behind it, others don't believe in it. What's your opinion?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
B
Beckon Hollow
Guest
My thoughts on global warming.
Science is supposed to be based on facts. When it comes to the topic of global warming there are two distinct sides on the subject. With so many scientific views arguing each other on both sides, would it not seem that there is legitimate reason to question both sides? The debate really is not over, no one knows. I just find it disgusting that this is being used as a political tool for the sole purpose of taking peoples money and promoting socialism.
Science is supposed to be based on facts. When it comes to the topic of global warming there are two distinct sides on the subject. With so many scientific views arguing each other on both sides, would it not seem that there is legitimate reason to question both sides? The debate really is not over, no one knows. I just find it disgusting that this is being used as a political tool for the sole purpose of taking peoples money and promoting socialism.
J
jd61
Guest
The biggest Hoax in mans history!
L
linlyons
Guest
when someone tells you, "Here's my theory", chances are he's wrong.
maybe you ought to ask what real scientists think.
and why they think that.
NAS, NOAA, NSF, NASA, EPA, MIT, UCLA all agree. AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) is a serious problem.
http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer
"May 19, 2008: The National Academies have released the 2008 edition of "Understanding and Responding to Climate Change," a free booklet designed to give the public a comprehensive and easy-to-read analysis of findings and recommendations from our reports on climate change."
http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/climate_change_2008_final.pdf <== here's a good description.
http://www.funnyweather.org/ <== this is a more lighthearted link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_effect <== and one with too much detail.
http://www.sciencefriday.com/videos/watch/10125 <== Michael Oppenheimer, a member of the Nobel Peace Prize-winning Intergovernmental Committee on Climate Change and professor at Princeton
http://www.lenntech.com/greenhouse-effect/global-warming-history.htm <== btw this is not a new idea.
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/home.html
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/2008/perspectives.html
http://www.exploratorium.edu/climate/ <== not regulated by the government.
-------
here are some reasons people think it's wrong.
and why they are wrong.
http://scholarsandrogues.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/anti-global-heating-claims-a-reasonably-thorough-debunking/
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
http://greenhome.huddler.com/wiki/global-warming-and-climate-change-causes
maybe you ought to ask what real scientists think.
and why they think that.
NAS, NOAA, NSF, NASA, EPA, MIT, UCLA all agree. AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) is a serious problem.
http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer
"May 19, 2008: The National Academies have released the 2008 edition of "Understanding and Responding to Climate Change," a free booklet designed to give the public a comprehensive and easy-to-read analysis of findings and recommendations from our reports on climate change."
http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/climate_change_2008_final.pdf <== here's a good description.
http://www.funnyweather.org/ <== this is a more lighthearted link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_effect <== and one with too much detail.
http://www.sciencefriday.com/videos/watch/10125 <== Michael Oppenheimer, a member of the Nobel Peace Prize-winning Intergovernmental Committee on Climate Change and professor at Princeton
http://www.lenntech.com/greenhouse-effect/global-warming-history.htm <== btw this is not a new idea.
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/home.html
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/2008/perspectives.html
http://www.exploratorium.edu/climate/ <== not regulated by the government.
-------
here are some reasons people think it's wrong.
and why they are wrong.
http://scholarsandrogues.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/anti-global-heating-claims-a-reasonably-thorough-debunking/
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
http://greenhome.huddler.com/wiki/global-warming-and-climate-change-causes
S
Scorpio Wild Card
Guest
Don't believe in it, never did!
B
baleno12002
Guest
nature just warming up a bit after cooling down a bit. way nature takes care of herself.
M
marine63
Guest
its god hugging us really tight for doing a great job in iraq
J
John S
Guest
we are the ones responsible for all the problems in the world, with our excessive consumptions and our support of the Israeli geonicide in Gaza.
J
Jedesyus
Guest
If greenhouse gases are indeed trapping heat within the atmosphere, then we should expect the temperature to steadily increase, but then decrease into an ice age when the solar rays can no longer effectivelyreach earth,
I personally think the greenhouse theory is a load of garbage.
I personally think the greenhouse theory is a load of garbage.